Evolving Strategies in HBV Management: Insights From Updated International Guidelines

Recent updates to the international guidelines for chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection reflect evolving concepts in disease monitoring and antiviral treatment strategies. The 2024-2025 guidelines from the World Health Organization (WHO), the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL), and the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) incorporate new evidence on treatment eligibility, biomarkers, and long-term management of nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA) therapy. A key shift across these guidelines is the expansion of treatment eligibility beyond traditional alanine aminotransferase and HBV DNA thresholds, with increasing emphasis on fibrosis stage, age, and risk-based assessment. Emerging viral biomarkers-including quantitative HBsAg, HBV RNA, and HBcrAg-are also gaining attention as tools to refine disease stratification and guide treatment decisions, although their recommended roles vary among guidelines. Another area of evolving practice involves the concept of finite NA therapy. Although long-term antiviral therapy remains the standard approach, selected patients may be considered for treatment withdrawal under careful monitoring. However, recommendations differ substantially across guidelines, with WHO adopting a more conservative position, whereas EASL and AASLD allow individualized consideration of treatment discontinuation in selected noncirrhotic patients. Overall, these updated guidelines highlight both areas of convergence and ongoing controversy in HBV management. Understanding these differences is essential for clinicians to interpret guideline recommendations in the context of local practice settings and to guide future research aimed at achieving functional cure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Hepatology Research
Published
2026-05-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/hepr.70205
Primary Topic
Hepatitis B Virus Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evolving Strategies in HBV Management: Insights From Updated International Guidelines

Mindie H. Nguyen, Grace Lai‐Hung Wong, Rui Huang, Masaru Enomoto
Hepatology Research
Hepatitis B Virus Studies
article

Evolving Strategies in HBV Management: Insights From Updated International Guidelines

Mindie H. Nguyen, Grace Lai‐Hung Wong, Rui Huang, Masaru Enomoto
article en

Abstract

Recent updates to the international guidelines for chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection reflect evolving concepts in disease monitoring and antiviral treatment strategies. The 2024-2025 guidelines from the World Health Organization (WHO), the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL), and the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) incorporate new evidence on treatment eligibility, biomarkers, and long-term management of nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA) therapy. A key shift across these guidelines is the expansion of treatment eligibility beyond traditional alanine aminotransferase and HBV DNA thresholds, with increasing emphasis on fibrosis stage, age, and risk-based assessment. Emerging viral biomarkers-including quantitative HBsAg, HBV RNA, and HBcrAg-are also gaining attention as tools to refine disease stratification and guide treatment decisions, although their recommended roles vary among guidelines. Another area of evolving practice involves the concept of finite NA therapy. Although long-term antiviral therapy remains the standard approach, selected patients may be considered for treatment withdrawal under careful monitoring. However, recommendations differ substantially across guidelines, with WHO adopting a more conservative position, whereas EASL and AASLD allow individualized consideration of treatment discontinuation in selected noncirrhotic patients. Overall, these updated guidelines highlight both areas of convergence and ongoing controversy in HBV management. Understanding these differences is essential for clinicians to interpret guideline recommendations in the context of local practice settings and to guide future research aimed at achieving functional cure.

Hepatology Research
Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK), Osaka City General Hospital (JP), Stanford Health Care (US), Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital (CN), Stanford Medicine (US), Osaka Metropolitan University (JP), Tokyo Metropolitan University (JP), Stanford University (US)
Exact Sciences Corporation, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer, American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, Gilead Sciences, Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Policy Research
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Hepatitis B Virus Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.