Interfacial Nucleation Mechanisms in Reservoir‐Free Na All Solid‐State Batteries Using Ultrathin Interlayers and Low Stack Pressure

Controlling sodium nucleation at the current collector|solid electrolyte interface remains a key challenge for realizing “reservoir‐free” sodium all‐solid‐state batteries (RF‐ASSBs), particularly under low stack pressure. While metals have been explored as sodium hosts or current collectors, the use of ultrathin metallic interlayers capable of regulating sodium nucleation with minimal sodium inventory penalty remains largely unexplored. Here, we present a comparative interfacial study of 50 nm sputtered Sn and In interlayers deposited on NaSICON electrolytes. By combining electrochemical characterization, microelectrode experiments, and operando and ex situ time‐of‐flight secondary ion mass spectrometry, we directly probe early‐stage sodium nucleation, interfacial chemistry, and reversibility. Sn undergoes electrochemically driven Na–Sn alloy formation independent of current rate and with high sodium diffusivity, enabling homogeneous nucleation and stable plating/stripping through a persistent alloy interphase while incurring only minimal irreversible sodium loss (∼0.031 mAh cm −2 ). In contrast, In fails to sustain stable interfacial sodium transport, leading to subfilm sodium deposition, mechanical disruption of the interlayer, sodium trapping, and rapid interfacial failure. These results demonstrate that, for ultrathin interlayers operated under low stack pressure, alloy‐assisted fast sodium transport within a stabilized interlayer, rather than generic sodiophilicity, governs interfacial stability, providing mechanistic design guidelines for RF‐ASSBs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ChemElectroChem
Published
2026-05-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/celc.70231
Primary Topic
Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interfacial Nucleation Mechanisms in Reservoir‐Free Na All Solid‐State Batteries Using Ultrathin Interlayers and Low Stack Pressure

S FEARN, Ricardo Jiménez, Ainara Aguadero, Stephen Skinner et al.
ChemElectroChem
Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
article

Interfacial Nucleation Mechanisms in Reservoir‐Free Na All Solid‐State Batteries Using Ultrathin Interlayers and Low Stack Pressure

S FEARN, Ricardo Jiménez, Ainara Aguadero, Stephen Skinner, Cristina García, Richard Chater
article en

Abstract

Controlling sodium nucleation at the current collector|solid electrolyte interface remains a key challenge for realizing “reservoir‐free” sodium all‐solid‐state batteries (RF‐ASSBs), particularly under low stack pressure. While metals have been explored as sodium hosts or current collectors, the use of ultrathin metallic interlayers capable of regulating sodium nucleation with minimal sodium inventory penalty remains largely unexplored. Here, we present a comparative interfacial study of 50 nm sputtered Sn and In interlayers deposited on NaSICON electrolytes. By combining electrochemical characterization, microelectrode experiments, and operando and ex situ time‐of‐flight secondary ion mass spectrometry, we directly probe early‐stage sodium nucleation, interfacial chemistry, and reversibility. Sn undergoes electrochemically driven Na–Sn alloy formation independent of current rate and with high sodium diffusivity, enabling homogeneous nucleation and stable plating/stripping through a persistent alloy interphase while incurring only minimal irreversible sodium loss (∼0.031 mAh cm −2 ). In contrast, In fails to sustain stable interfacial sodium transport, leading to subfilm sodium deposition, mechanical disruption of the interlayer, sodium trapping, and rapid interfacial failure. These results demonstrate that, for ultrathin interlayers operated under low stack pressure, alloy‐assisted fast sodium transport within a stabilized interlayer, rather than generic sodiophilicity, governs interfacial stability, providing mechanistic design guidelines for RF‐ASSBs.

ChemElectroChemVol. 13(10)
Instituto de Ciencia de Materiales de Madrid (ES), Imperial College London (GB)
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.