Binaural Processing Is Key to Tonal-Language Benefits and Right-Ear Advantage for Segregation of Competing Speech

Purpose: This study aimed to compare speech-in-speech recognition between Mandarin-speaking (“Chinese”) and English-speaking (“American”) normal-hearing adult listeners under monaural and binaural listening conditions. Method: Speech recognition thresholds (SRTs) in competing speech were measured in 20 Chinese and 20 American listeners using a modified coordinate response measure task. Target sentences spoken by a male talker were presented alongside two competing sentences spoken by two different male talkers (same-sex maskers) or by two female talkers (different-sex maskers). The target speech was delivered to one ear, while masker speech was presented either to the same ear (“monaural listening”) or simultaneously to both ears (“binaural listening”). Sex-based masking release was defined as the difference in SRTs between same-sex and different-sex maskers. Binaural unmasking was defined as the difference in SRTs between monaural and binaural listening. Results: SRTs were lower with binaural than monaural listening and with different-sex than same-sex maskers. Under binaural conditions, Chinese listeners showed lower SRTs than American listeners (tonal-language benefit), and right-ear targets yielded lower SRTs than left-ear targets (right-ear advantage [REA]). Robust sex-based masking release and binaural unmasking were observed across listeners. Sex-based masking release was greater with monaural than binaural listening, with a significant interaction between language and listening mode. American listeners showed greater release with monaural than with binaural listening relative to Chinese listeners. In contrast, binaural unmasking was larger for Chinese than for American listeners, particularly with same-sex maskers and right-ear targets. Tonal-language benefits emerged only with different-sex maskers, whereas REAs were restricted to same-sex maskers. Conclusion: Significant tonal-language benefits and REAs emerged only under binaural listening conditions, suggesting that binaural processing plays a critical role for segregation of competing speech. Supplemental Material: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.32137030

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research
Published
2026-05-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1044/2026_jslhr-25-00675
Primary Topic
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Binaural Processing Is Key to Tonal-Language Benefits and Right-Ear Advantage for Segregation of Competing Speech

Ping Liu, Qian-Jie Fu, Vivian Chang, Emily C. Wong et al.
Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
article

Binaural Processing Is Key to Tonal-Language Benefits and Right-Ear Advantage for Segregation of Competing Speech

Ping Liu, Qian-Jie Fu, Vivian Chang, Emily C. Wong, John J. Galvin, Biao Chen, Jingyuan Chen, Trevor Ramsey, Yongxin Li
article en

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to compare speech-in-speech recognition between Mandarin-speaking (“Chinese”) and English-speaking (“American”) normal-hearing adult listeners under monaural and binaural listening conditions. Method: Speech recognition thresholds (SRTs) in competing speech were measured in 20 Chinese and 20 American listeners using a modified coordinate response measure task. Target sentences spoken by a male talker were presented alongside two competing sentences spoken by two different male talkers (same-sex maskers) or by two female talkers (different-sex maskers). The target speech was delivered to one ear, while masker speech was presented either to the same ear (“monaural listening”) or simultaneously to both ears (“binaural listening”). Sex-based masking release was defined as the difference in SRTs between same-sex and different-sex maskers. Binaural unmasking was defined as the difference in SRTs between monaural and binaural listening. Results: SRTs were lower with binaural than monaural listening and with different-sex than same-sex maskers. Under binaural conditions, Chinese listeners showed lower SRTs than American listeners (tonal-language benefit), and right-ear targets yielded lower SRTs than left-ear targets (right-ear advantage [REA]). Robust sex-based masking release and binaural unmasking were observed across listeners. Sex-based masking release was greater with monaural than binaural listening, with a significant interaction between language and listening mode. American listeners showed greater release with monaural than with binaural listening relative to Chinese listeners. In contrast, binaural unmasking was larger for Chinese than for American listeners, particularly with same-sex maskers and right-ear targets. Tonal-language benefits emerged only with different-sex maskers, whereas REAs were restricted to same-sex maskers. Conclusion: Significant tonal-language benefits and REAs emerged only under binaural listening conditions, suggesting that binaural processing plays a critical role for segregation of competing speech. Supplemental Material: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.32137030

Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research
Beijing Tongren Hospital (CN), House Clinic (US), University of California, Los Angeles (US), Capital Medical University (CN), Aviation General Hospital (CN)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.