Influence of learning activities and background characteristics on pharmacology exam success in second-year medical students at a French university: the Pharmaquest study

Abstract Background Pharmacology education faces challenges due to evolving student learning behaviors. This study examined the feasibility of identifying which student-level characteristics, academic background and learning activities were associated with performance at the pharmacology exam using routinely-collected data. Methods In a prospective cohort study of second-year medical students at Caen Normandie University (2024–2025), we analyzed in-person lecture, online resource, and peer tutoring mock exam attendance, as well as use of student-written lecture support, and pharmacology exam outcomes. The primary outcome was final pharmacology exam score (over 20points), according to pedagogical methods, estimated through multivariate linear regression. Results Participants (164 out-of 250 eligible students(66%)) were well representative of 2 nd year medical students, with two thirds of women, high prior academic achievement, and a median age of 19. In the univariate analysis, higher in-person lecture attendance was significantly associated with a higher score at the pharmacology exam (+ 0.41points for each additional 10h of attendance, 95%Confidence Interval (CI): + 0.05 to + 0.77). Similarly, the number of online resources downloaded showed a positive association in univariate analysis (+ 0.53points for each additional 10downloads, 95%CI: + 0.09 to + 0.97). In-person lecture attendance remained significant in the multivariate model (+ 0.46points, 95%CI:0.03–0.88). Peer tutoring exam attendance and student-written lecture support use were not associated with a significant change in exam score. In-person lecture attendance exhibited a U-shaped relationship with exam performance: initial declines (up to 10h) preceded gradual improvement, plateauing at 25–30 h (spline regression, p < 0.05). Prior academic achievement (baccalaureate distinction, rapid first-year completion) and curriculum (first-year major being health-science) were significantly associated with higher exam score. Conclusions This pilot study demonstrates the feasibility and value of quantitatively evaluating pharmacology education among French medical students. Academic background and pedagogical methods seem to influence pharmacology exam success. Broader replication, and long-term follow-up are needed to confirm these insights and identify determinants of student success more robustly.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Education
Published
2026-05-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-09454-7
Primary Topic
Innovations in Educational Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Influence of learning activities and background characteristics on pharmacology exam success in second-year medical students at a French university: the Pharmaquest study

Sophie Fédrizzi, Pierre‐Marie Morice, Damien Legallois, Xavier Humbert et al.
BMC Medical Education
Innovations in Educational Methods
article

Influence of learning activities and background characteristics on pharmacology exam success in second-year medical students at a French university: the Pharmaquest study

Sophie Fédrizzi, Pierre‐Marie Morice, Damien Legallois, Xavier Humbert, Branko Aleksić, Hideki Kasuya, Charles Dolladille, Véronique Lelong‐Boulouard, Jean-Marie Dumont, Joachim Alexandre, Basile Chretien, Eric Saillot
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Pharmacology education faces challenges due to evolving student learning behaviors. This study examined the feasibility of identifying which student-level characteristics, academic background and learning activities were associated with performance at the pharmacology exam using routinely-collected data. Methods In a prospective cohort study of second-year medical students at Caen Normandie University (2024–2025), we analyzed in-person lecture, online resource, and peer tutoring mock exam attendance, as well as use of student-written lecture support, and pharmacology exam outcomes. The primary outcome was final pharmacology exam score (over 20points), according to pedagogical methods, estimated through multivariate linear regression. Results Participants (164 out-of 250 eligible students(66%)) were well representative of 2 nd year medical students, with two thirds of women, high prior academic achievement, and a median age of 19. In the univariate analysis, higher in-person lecture attendance was significantly associated with a higher score at the pharmacology exam (+ 0.41points for each additional 10h of attendance, 95%Confidence Interval (CI): + 0.05 to + 0.77). Similarly, the number of online resources downloaded showed a positive association in univariate analysis (+ 0.53points for each additional 10downloads, 95%CI: + 0.09 to + 0.97). In-person lecture attendance remained significant in the multivariate model (+ 0.46points, 95%CI:0.03–0.88). Peer tutoring exam attendance and student-written lecture support use were not associated with a significant change in exam score. In-person lecture attendance exhibited a U-shaped relationship with exam performance: initial declines (up to 10h) preceded gradual improvement, plateauing at 25–30 h (spline regression, p < 0.05). Prior academic achievement (baccalaureate distinction, rapid first-year completion) and curriculum (first-year major being health-science) were significantly associated with higher exam score. Conclusions This pilot study demonstrates the feasibility and value of quantitatively evaluating pharmacology education among French medical students. Academic background and pedagogical methods seem to influence pharmacology exam success. Broader replication, and long-term follow-up are needed to confirm these insights and identify determinants of student success more robustly.

BMC Medical Education
Inserm (FR), Nagoya City University (JP), Normandie Université (FR), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Caen Normandie (FR), Cyceron (FR), Nagoya University (JP), Université de Caen Normandie (FR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Innovations in Educational Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.