The Heterogeneous Regional Employment Effects of Environmental Policies

ABSTRACT This paper examines the effects of Environmental Policies—measured by the OECD Environmental Policy Stringency Index (EPS)—on employment in 349 regions across 26 countries from 1990 to 2020. We find that more stringent EPS have short‐term negative effects on regional employment, which disappear in the medium term. However, the magnitude of these effects is economically modest: a one standard deviation increase in EPS reduces employment by about 0.14% at its peak, corresponding to roughly 8% of typical annual regional employment fluctuations. The impact varies depending on the type of policy implemented, with market‐based instruments having a greater and more persistent effect. Importantly, while average effects are limited, employment costs are highly concentrated in specific regions—particularly those with higher emissions, larger industrial sectors and lower human capital. Regions in countries with stronger active labour market policies experience less short‐term negative effects, while lower employment protection leads to reallocation and job creation in the medium term.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics
Published
2026-05-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/obes.70088
Primary Topic
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Heterogeneous Regional Employment Effects of Environmental Policies

Pietro Pizzuto, Fabio Mazzola, Luca Bettarelli, Khatereh Yarveisi et al.
Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
article

The Heterogeneous Regional Employment Effects of Environmental Policies

Pietro Pizzuto, Fabio Mazzola, Luca Bettarelli, Khatereh Yarveisi, Davide Furceri
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper examines the effects of Environmental Policies—measured by the OECD Environmental Policy Stringency Index (EPS)—on employment in 349 regions across 26 countries from 1990 to 2020. We find that more stringent EPS have short‐term negative effects on regional employment, which disappear in the medium term. However, the magnitude of these effects is economically modest: a one standard deviation increase in EPS reduces employment by about 0.14% at its peak, corresponding to roughly 8% of typical annual regional employment fluctuations. The impact varies depending on the type of policy implemented, with market‐based instruments having a greater and more persistent effect. Importantly, while average effects are limited, employment costs are highly concentrated in specific regions—particularly those with higher emissions, larger industrial sectors and lower human capital. Regions in countries with stronger active labour market policies experience less short‐term negative effects, while lower employment protection leads to reallocation and job creation in the medium term.

Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics
Ospedale Infermi di Rimini (IT), Centre for Economic Policy Research (GB), University of Palermo (IT)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.