Impact of lipoprotein(a) on the durability of aortic bioprosthetic valves

Abstract Background The expanding use of bioprosthetic aortic valve replacements has raised concerns regarding the long-term durability of bioprosthetic valve prostheses. While lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is implicated in the pathogenesis of native aortic valve stenosis, its impact on bioprosthetic valve degeneration leading to reintervention remains unclear. Objective To evaluate the association between Lp(a) levels and structural degeneration of aortic bioprosthetic valves in patients undergoing secondary aortic valve procedure. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 389 patients with available Lp(a) values who underwent replacement of a degenerated aortic bioprosthetic valves between February 2001 and September 2024. Endpoint was the interval from initial surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) to the second aortic valve procedure either as transvascular or surgical replacement. Patients were stratified by Lp(a) levels into low (< 105 nmol/L) and high (≥ 105 nmol/L) Lp(a) groups. Associations between Lp(a) levels and time-to-reintervention were assessed using Kaplan–Meier survival analysis. Results Out of an initial cohort of 909 patients, 389 met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 296 patients showed low and 93 high Lp(a) levels. Baseline characteristics were comparable between both groups. The median time from initial valve implantation to the second aortic valve intervention did not differ significantly by Lp(a) group. Kaplan–Meier analysis demonstrated no significant association between elevated Lp(a) and time-to-reintervention (hazard ratio [HR] 0.81; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.58 – 1.13; p = 0.215). Conclusions In this cohort of patients undergoing secondary aortic valve procedure, elevated Lp(a) levels were not associated with earlier need for reintervention. Unlike in native aortic stenosis, our findings do not support a clinically meaningful role for Lp(a) in bioprosthetic aortic valve degeneration. Graphical Abstract

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Research in Cardiology
Published
2026-05-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-026-02933-3
Primary Topic
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of lipoprotein(a) on the durability of aortic bioprosthetic valves

Hendrik B. Sager, Finn Syryca, Johannes Krefting, Thorsten Kessler et al.
Clinical Research in Cardiology
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
article

Impact of lipoprotein(a) on the durability of aortic bioprosthetic valves

Hendrik B. Sager, Finn Syryca, Johannes Krefting, Thorsten Kessler, Elisabeth Oertel, Magdalena Erlebach, Costanza Pellegrini, Moritz von Scheidt, Felix Wirth, T Rheude, A Kastrati, W Koenig, N. Patrick Mayr, Stefan Holdenrieder, Heribert Schunkert, Teresa Trenkwalder, Hector A. Alvarez-Covarrubias, Erion Xhepa, Hendrik Ruge, Michael Joner, Markus Krane
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background The expanding use of bioprosthetic aortic valve replacements has raised concerns regarding the long-term durability of bioprosthetic valve prostheses. While lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is implicated in the pathogenesis of native aortic valve stenosis, its impact on bioprosthetic valve degeneration leading to reintervention remains unclear. Objective To evaluate the association between Lp(a) levels and structural degeneration of aortic bioprosthetic valves in patients undergoing secondary aortic valve procedure. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 389 patients with available Lp(a) values who underwent replacement of a degenerated aortic bioprosthetic valves between February 2001 and September 2024. Endpoint was the interval from initial surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) to the second aortic valve procedure either as transvascular or surgical replacement. Patients were stratified by Lp(a) levels into low (< 105 nmol/L) and high (≥ 105 nmol/L) Lp(a) groups. Associations between Lp(a) levels and time-to-reintervention were assessed using Kaplan–Meier survival analysis. Results Out of an initial cohort of 909 patients, 389 met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 296 patients showed low and 93 high Lp(a) levels. Baseline characteristics were comparable between both groups. The median time from initial valve implantation to the second aortic valve intervention did not differ significantly by Lp(a) group. Kaplan–Meier analysis demonstrated no significant association between elevated Lp(a) and time-to-reintervention (hazard ratio [HR] 0.81; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.58 – 1.13; p = 0.215). Conclusions In this cohort of patients undergoing secondary aortic valve procedure, elevated Lp(a) levels were not associated with earlier need for reintervention. Unlike in native aortic stenosis, our findings do not support a clinically meaningful role for Lp(a) in bioprosthetic aortic valve degeneration. Graphical Abstract

Clinical Research in Cardiology
Centro Medico Nacional Siglo XXI (MX), German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DE), Deutsches Herzzentrum München (DE), Saarland University (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.