Nebulized Heparin in Adults With Acute Respiratory Failure: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials

OBJECTIVES: Dysregulated pulmonary coagulation and inflammation is a hallmark of respiratory failure in various etiologies. Excessive fibrin deposition contributes to alveolar collapse, impaired gas exchange, and progression to pulmonary fibrosis. Nebulized heparin can mitigate these coagulation and inflammation disturbances. Although several randomized controlled trials have explored its effects, results remain inconsistent and limited by small patient populations. We conducted a random-effects meta-analysis to calculate the risk ratio (RR) and 95% CIs. DATA SOURCES: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for randomized controlled trials comparing nebulized unfractionated heparin to standard care or placebo in adult patients with respiratory failure either invasively mechanical ventilated or not. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at the longest follow-up. STUDY SELECTION: We included randomized clinical trials enrolling adult patients with respiratory failure, comparing nebulized heparin vs. standard care or placebo, and reporting at least one clinical outcome, including all-cause mortality. DATA EXTRACTION: Two independent investigators extracted data on trial design, setting, etiology of respiratory failure, heparin dosing regimens, follow-up duration, and outcomes. Discrepancies were resolved by consensus. DATA SYNTHESIS: We identified 16 studies (787 receiving nebulized heparin, 833 control). Six (38%) were multicenter, five focused on COVID-19, 12 enrolled ICU patients, and dosing clustered around 25,000 international units (IUs) three times a day (~75,000 IU/d for ~10 d). At the longest follow-up, nebulized heparin reduced all-cause mortality vs. control (110/645 [17.1%] vs. 157/711 [22.1%]; RR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.66-0.95; with ten studies included). Nebulized heparin was also associated with more ventilation-free days by day 28 (mean difference, +4.85; 95% CI, 1.47-8.24). Major bleeding was rare (1.1 vs. 0.7%; RR, 1.48; 95% CI, 0.42-5.18), while no minor bleeding or heparin-induced thrombocytopenia was reported. CONCLUSIONS: Nebulized unfractionated heparin may improve survival in patients with respiratory failure without increasing adverse events.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Care Medicine
Published
2026-05-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/ccm.0000000000007161
Primary Topic
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nebulized Heparin in Adults With Acute Respiratory Failure: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials

Giacomo Monti, Alessandro Belletti, S Turi, Federica Corbo et al.
Critical Care Medicine
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
article

Nebulized Heparin in Adults With Acute Respiratory Failure: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials

Giacomo Monti, Alessandro Belletti, S Turi, Federica Corbo, for the Nebulized Heparin Study Group, Stefano Fresilli, Brian Ferrara, Marcus J. Schultz, Aldo Pio Luciano, Rosa Labanca, Giovanni Landoni
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Dysregulated pulmonary coagulation and inflammation is a hallmark of respiratory failure in various etiologies. Excessive fibrin deposition contributes to alveolar collapse, impaired gas exchange, and progression to pulmonary fibrosis. Nebulized heparin can mitigate these coagulation and inflammation disturbances. Although several randomized controlled trials have explored its effects, results remain inconsistent and limited by small patient populations. We conducted a random-effects meta-analysis to calculate the risk ratio (RR) and 95% CIs. DATA SOURCES: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for randomized controlled trials comparing nebulized unfractionated heparin to standard care or placebo in adult patients with respiratory failure either invasively mechanical ventilated or not. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at the longest follow-up. STUDY SELECTION: We included randomized clinical trials enrolling adult patients with respiratory failure, comparing nebulized heparin vs. standard care or placebo, and reporting at least one clinical outcome, including all-cause mortality. DATA EXTRACTION: Two independent investigators extracted data on trial design, setting, etiology of respiratory failure, heparin dosing regimens, follow-up duration, and outcomes. Discrepancies were resolved by consensus. DATA SYNTHESIS: We identified 16 studies (787 receiving nebulized heparin, 833 control). Six (38%) were multicenter, five focused on COVID-19, 12 enrolled ICU patients, and dosing clustered around 25,000 international units (IUs) three times a day (~75,000 IU/d for ~10 d). At the longest follow-up, nebulized heparin reduced all-cause mortality vs. control (110/645 [17.1%] vs. 157/711 [22.1%]; RR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.66-0.95; with ten studies included). Nebulized heparin was also associated with more ventilation-free days by day 28 (mean difference, +4.85; 95% CI, 1.47-8.24). Major bleeding was rare (1.1 vs. 0.7%; RR, 1.48; 95% CI, 0.42-5.18), while no minor bleeding or heparin-induced thrombocytopenia was reported. CONCLUSIONS: Nebulized unfractionated heparin may improve survival in patients with respiratory failure without increasing adverse events.

Critical Care Medicine
Apple (Israel) (IL), Vita-Salute San Raffaele University (IT), Vienna General Hospital (AT), Kleijnen Systematic Reviews (United Kingdom) (GB), Collaborative Group (United States) (US), Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IT), Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico San Raffaele (IT), Medical University of Vienna (AT)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.