Consumer Perceptions, Preferences, and Behaviour

This dissertation investigates how socio-economic context and individual perceptions shape economic behaviour and policy preferences. Drawing on behavioural economics and social comparison theory, it explores how concerns about relative standing and biased beliefs generate systematic deviations from the predictions of standard economic theory. The dissertation consists of a synopsis and three empirical chapters. The synopsis outlines the theoretical framework, research questions, and methodological approaches, situating the analyses within broader debates on social comparisons, belief formation, and decision-making under inequality and policy constraints. The second chapter examines how rising income inequality affects household consumption and saving behaviour through status competition. The third chapter investigates how perceptions of consumer spending as visible and status relevant vary across socio-demographic groups. The fourth chapter analyses how personalised information about the household-level costs of carbon pricing shapes individuals’ support for carbon pricing under current and higher projected price levels. Overall, the dissertation highlights the central role of individual beliefs and perceptions in shaping economic behaviour and political attitudes during periods of economic and ecological transformation. It provides evidence for more behaviourally informed policy design in the fields of inequality, consumption, housing, and climate policy. The findings further underscore the importance of public policy and public service provision in reducing social inequalities, mitigating status-driven overconsumption, and strengthening societal support for socio-ecological transformation processes.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Universitätsbibliographie, Universität Duisburg-Essen
Published
2026-05-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17185/duepublico/86027
Primary Topic
Social Policy and Reform Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Consumer Perceptions, Preferences, and Behaviour

Lukas Endres
Universitätsbibliographie, Universität Duisburg-Essen
Social Policy and Reform Studies
article

Consumer Perceptions, Preferences, and Behaviour

Lukas Endres
article en

Abstract

This dissertation investigates how socio-economic context and individual perceptions shape economic behaviour and policy preferences. Drawing on behavioural economics and social comparison theory, it explores how concerns about relative standing and biased beliefs generate systematic deviations from the predictions of standard economic theory. The dissertation consists of a synopsis and three empirical chapters. The synopsis outlines the theoretical framework, research questions, and methodological approaches, situating the analyses within broader debates on social comparisons, belief formation, and decision-making under inequality and policy constraints. The second chapter examines how rising income inequality affects household consumption and saving behaviour through status competition. The third chapter investigates how perceptions of consumer spending as visible and status relevant vary across socio-demographic groups. The fourth chapter analyses how personalised information about the household-level costs of carbon pricing shapes individuals’ support for carbon pricing under current and higher projected price levels. Overall, the dissertation highlights the central role of individual beliefs and perceptions in shaping economic behaviour and political attitudes during periods of economic and ecological transformation. It provides evidence for more behaviourally informed policy design in the fields of inequality, consumption, housing, and climate policy. The findings further underscore the importance of public policy and public service provision in reducing social inequalities, mitigating status-driven overconsumption, and strengthening societal support for socio-ecological transformation processes.

Universitätsbibliographie, Universität Duisburg-Essen
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Social Policy and Reform Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.