FDI and coal lock-in: The Global South’s development dilemma

• Poorer countries continue to adopt coal-fired power while richer countries phase it out. • Combine transaction-level global greenfield investment data with stacked DID. • New coal power boosts inward greenfield investments by 7.9% annually in the Global South. • Coal power expansion crowds out renewable technology investments. • Structural asymmetries drive the coal power-FDI coupling. Why do poorer countries continue to adopt coal-fired power despite global climate pressures, while richer countries phase it out? This paper argues that the divergence in coal power phase-out trajectories between the Global North and South is driven by the coupling of greenfield investment with coal-fired power expansion in the Global South. Using matched global greenfield investments at the project level with coal plants at the city-level and employing the stacked DID strategy, we find that new coal-fired power installations increase cities’ inbound greenfield investment by 7.9% annually over eight years, particularly in low- and lower-middle-income countries; however, the inward capital is less oriented toward renewable technologies. This linkage arises from structural asymmetries: capital flows from the Global North to the South, the relocation of energy-intensive industries, and fragmented environmental regulation. Our findings highlight that the dilemma faced by developing countries: phasing out coal-fired power entails extremely high opportunity costs, while expanding coal power capacity crowds out investments in renewable technologies. Overall, we provide new evidence on how uneven development constraints result in fossil fuel dependency in the Global South.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
World Development
Published
2026-05-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2026.107453
Primary Topic
Natural Resources and Economic Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

FDI and coal lock-in: The Global South’s development dilemma

Huanhuan Zheng, Xinya Hao, Lin Zhang
World Development
Natural Resources and Economic Development
article

FDI and coal lock-in: The Global South’s development dilemma

Huanhuan Zheng, Xinya Hao, Lin Zhang
article en

Abstract

• Poorer countries continue to adopt coal-fired power while richer countries phase it out. • Combine transaction-level global greenfield investment data with stacked DID. • New coal power boosts inward greenfield investments by 7.9% annually in the Global South. • Coal power expansion crowds out renewable technology investments. • Structural asymmetries drive the coal power-FDI coupling. Why do poorer countries continue to adopt coal-fired power despite global climate pressures, while richer countries phase it out? This paper argues that the divergence in coal power phase-out trajectories between the Global North and South is driven by the coupling of greenfield investment with coal-fired power expansion in the Global South. Using matched global greenfield investments at the project level with coal plants at the city-level and employing the stacked DID strategy, we find that new coal-fired power installations increase cities’ inbound greenfield investment by 7.9% annually over eight years, particularly in low- and lower-middle-income countries; however, the inward capital is less oriented toward renewable technologies. This linkage arises from structural asymmetries: capital flows from the Global North to the South, the relocation of energy-intensive industries, and fragmented environmental regulation. Our findings highlight that the dilemma faced by developing countries: phasing out coal-fired power entails extremely high opportunity costs, while expanding coal power capacity crowds out investments in renewable technologies. Overall, we provide new evidence on how uneven development constraints result in fossil fuel dependency in the Global South.

World DevelopmentVol. 206
City University of Hong Kong (HK), Institute for the Future (US)
University Grants Committee
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Natural Resources and Economic Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.