Research on medical students’ medical ethics reasoning ability–analysis based on the intermediate concept measurement method

OBJECTIVE: By establishing an ethical assessment framework to evaluate the medical ethical reasoning ability of medical students, systematically reveal the current actual situation and problems of medical ethics education in medical schools, and provide empirical evidence and improvement directions for optimizing the medical ethics education system and enhancing educational effectiveness. METHOD: This study was based on the Medical Ethics Intermediate Concept Measurement (MD-ICM) questionnaire developed by Ponsopa Pinijphon from the University of Alabama in the United States. For the first time in China, it conducted a localization and cultural adaptation of the questionnaire. The questionnaire covers principles such as patient autonomy, confidentiality, beneficence, and fair distribution. The survey subjects were selected through a multi-stage random sampling method. A database was established using EpiData 3.1 software, and the data were statistically analyzed using SPSS 21.0 software. RESULT: Students who have studied medical ethics performed significantly better in making correct reasoning decisions compared to those who haven't; in terms of "the teaching methods of the Medical Ethics Course", students who chose scenario simulation and audio-visual learning methods scored significantly higher in ethical reasoning ability than those who chose theoretical lectures and case analysis; in terms of "the assessment methods of the Medical Ethics Course", students who chose ethical reasoning tests and did not undergo test assessment scored significantly higher in ethical reasoning ability than those who chose theoretical concept tests and case reflection essays; in terms of "the learning needs of the Medical Ethics Course", students with learning needs usually have stronger ethical emotions and ethical awareness. CONCLUSION: The medical ethics reasoning ability of medical students is significantly influenced by their medical ethics learning experiences, teaching methods of courses, assessment methods, and learning needs. Currently, there are shortcomings in medical ethics education in medical colleges. To enhance the ethical reasoning ability of medical students, it is necessary to strengthen the foundational position of medical ethics education, optimize the practice-oriented teaching mode, improve the diversified formative evaluation, and create a supportive educational atmosphere.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Ethics
Published
2026-05-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-026-01444-0
Primary Topic
Innovations in Medical Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Research on medical students’ medical ethics reasoning ability–analysis based on the intermediate concept measurement method

Lining Zhang, Chen Feng, Xuewen Zhang
BMC Medical Ethics
Innovations in Medical Education
article

Research on medical students’ medical ethics reasoning ability–analysis based on the intermediate concept measurement method

Lining Zhang, Chen Feng, Xuewen Zhang
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: By establishing an ethical assessment framework to evaluate the medical ethical reasoning ability of medical students, systematically reveal the current actual situation and problems of medical ethics education in medical schools, and provide empirical evidence and improvement directions for optimizing the medical ethics education system and enhancing educational effectiveness. METHOD: This study was based on the Medical Ethics Intermediate Concept Measurement (MD-ICM) questionnaire developed by Ponsopa Pinijphon from the University of Alabama in the United States. For the first time in China, it conducted a localization and cultural adaptation of the questionnaire. The questionnaire covers principles such as patient autonomy, confidentiality, beneficence, and fair distribution. The survey subjects were selected through a multi-stage random sampling method. A database was established using EpiData 3.1 software, and the data were statistically analyzed using SPSS 21.0 software. RESULT: Students who have studied medical ethics performed significantly better in making correct reasoning decisions compared to those who haven't; in terms of "the teaching methods of the Medical Ethics Course", students who chose scenario simulation and audio-visual learning methods scored significantly higher in ethical reasoning ability than those who chose theoretical lectures and case analysis; in terms of "the assessment methods of the Medical Ethics Course", students who chose ethical reasoning tests and did not undergo test assessment scored significantly higher in ethical reasoning ability than those who chose theoretical concept tests and case reflection essays; in terms of "the learning needs of the Medical Ethics Course", students with learning needs usually have stronger ethical emotions and ethical awareness. CONCLUSION: The medical ethics reasoning ability of medical students is significantly influenced by their medical ethics learning experiences, teaching methods of courses, assessment methods, and learning needs. Currently, there are shortcomings in medical ethics education in medical colleges. To enhance the ethical reasoning ability of medical students, it is necessary to strengthen the foundational position of medical ethics education, optimize the practice-oriented teaching mode, improve the diversified formative evaluation, and create a supportive educational atmosphere.

BMC Medical Ethics
Qufu Normal University (CN), Jining Medical University (CN)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Innovations in Medical Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.