Effect of Constrained Weight Shift With and Without Trunk Stabilization Training on Balance in Chronic Stroke Patients

Background Stroke survivors often exhibit impaired postural control and balance due to trunk weakness and asymmetrical weight-bearing, increasing the risk of falls and limiting functional independence. Targeted rehabilitation strategies are essential to improve static and dynamic balance in chronic stroke patients. Purpose This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of constrained weight shift (CWS) training with trunk stabilization versus CWS training alone on static and dynamic balance in chronic stroke patients. Methods Thirty chronic stroke patients were randomly assigned to Group A (CWS + trunk stabilization) or Group B (CWS only). Both groups underwent 45-60-minute sessions, five days per week for six weeks, totaling 26 supervised sessions. Training involved weight-shifting exercises, functional tasks, and core strengthening exercises for the experimental group. Balance outcomes were assessed using the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) and Trunk Impairment Scale (TIS) pre- and post-intervention. Results Both groups demonstrated improvements in static and dynamic balance; however, Group A showed significantly greater gains in BBS and TIS scores (p < 0.05). Conclusion Adding trunk stabilization to CWS training enhances static and dynamic balance recovery in chronic stroke patients.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2026-05-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.109058
Primary Topic
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of Constrained Weight Shift With and Without Trunk Stabilization Training on Balance in Chronic Stroke Patients

JN Kulkarni, Suraj Kanase
Cureus
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
article

Effect of Constrained Weight Shift With and Without Trunk Stabilization Training on Balance in Chronic Stroke Patients

JN Kulkarni, Suraj Kanase
article en

Abstract

Background Stroke survivors often exhibit impaired postural control and balance due to trunk weakness and asymmetrical weight-bearing, increasing the risk of falls and limiting functional independence. Targeted rehabilitation strategies are essential to improve static and dynamic balance in chronic stroke patients. Purpose This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of constrained weight shift (CWS) training with trunk stabilization versus CWS training alone on static and dynamic balance in chronic stroke patients. Methods Thirty chronic stroke patients were randomly assigned to Group A (CWS + trunk stabilization) or Group B (CWS only). Both groups underwent 45-60-minute sessions, five days per week for six weeks, totaling 26 supervised sessions. Training involved weight-shifting exercises, functional tasks, and core strengthening exercises for the experimental group. Balance outcomes were assessed using the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) and Trunk Impairment Scale (TIS) pre- and post-intervention. Results Both groups demonstrated improvements in static and dynamic balance; however, Group A showed significantly greater gains in BBS and TIS scores (p < 0.05). Conclusion Adding trunk stabilization to CWS training enhances static and dynamic balance recovery in chronic stroke patients.

Cureus
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Effect of Constrained Weight Shift With and Without Trunk Stabilization Training on Balance in Chronic Stroke Patients — JN Kulkarni, Suraj Kanase · Cureus (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS