Prediction‐Guided Two‐Step Solid‐State Exploration of Unknown Pseudo‐Ternary Oxides

Multicomponent oxides are important materials for energy, catalytic, and electronic applications, but their huge composition space makes exploration by conventional solid‐state synthesis inefficient. Machine learning‐based selection is combined with a two‐step experimental workflow for pseudo‐ternary oxide discovery. Pseudo‐ternary systems with no registered compositions in an Inorganic Crystal Structure Database are ranked by the average prediction score of a model trained only on pseudo‐binary oxides, and the top 300 systems are screened by a slurry‐based solid‐state reaction method suited for robotic dispensing. Among the 300 tested compositions, 21 show diffraction peaks that cannot be explained only by simple or binary oxides. Three match ternary oxide phases in a powder diffraction database, 15 suggest cation‐disordered ternary phases, and two copper‐containing samples form oxides with copper valence states different from those assumed in the prediction. One remaining composition yields a new oxide, Ba 5 SnV 6 O 22 . Structural analysis shows that this phase has a Ba 2 BiV 3 O 11 ‐related framework, in which the Bi‐equivalent site is randomly occupied by Sn and Ba. These results show that prediction‐guided selection and a robotics‐compatible synthesis workflow can work together for oxide discovery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advanced Intelligent Discovery
Published
2026-05-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/aidi.70130
Primary Topic
Machine Learning in Materials Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prediction‐Guided Two‐Step Solid‐State Exploration of Unknown Pseudo‐Ternary Oxides

Hiroyuki Hayashi
Advanced Intelligent Discovery
Machine Learning in Materials Science
article

Prediction‐Guided Two‐Step Solid‐State Exploration of Unknown Pseudo‐Ternary Oxides

Hiroyuki Hayashi
article en

Abstract

Multicomponent oxides are important materials for energy, catalytic, and electronic applications, but their huge composition space makes exploration by conventional solid‐state synthesis inefficient. Machine learning‐based selection is combined with a two‐step experimental workflow for pseudo‐ternary oxide discovery. Pseudo‐ternary systems with no registered compositions in an Inorganic Crystal Structure Database are ranked by the average prediction score of a model trained only on pseudo‐binary oxides, and the top 300 systems are screened by a slurry‐based solid‐state reaction method suited for robotic dispensing. Among the 300 tested compositions, 21 show diffraction peaks that cannot be explained only by simple or binary oxides. Three match ternary oxide phases in a powder diffraction database, 15 suggest cation‐disordered ternary phases, and two copper‐containing samples form oxides with copper valence states different from those assumed in the prediction. One remaining composition yields a new oxide, Ba 5 SnV 6 O 22 . Structural analysis shows that this phase has a Ba 2 BiV 3 O 11 ‐related framework, in which the Bi‐equivalent site is randomly occupied by Sn and Ba. These results show that prediction‐guided selection and a robotics‐compatible synthesis workflow can work together for oxide discovery.

Advanced Intelligent Discovery
Kyoto University (JP)
Japan Science and Technology Agency
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Machine Learning in Materials Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.