Effects of Calorie Restriction With and Without Strength, Endurance or Mixed Training on Fat‐Free and Skeletal Muscle Mass in Overweight or Obese Individuals—A Systematic Review With Pairwise Meta‐Analysis and Network Meta‐Analysis of Randomized Cont

ABSTRACT Aims Calorie restriction (CR) reduces both fat mass and fat‐free mass (FFM), particularly skeletal muscle mass (SMM), which is essential for cardiometabolic health and preventing frailty. This study compares CR alone versus CR plus exercise (EX) on FFM and SMM in overweight/obese patients and examines the effects of different training modes. Methods A systematic literature search was conducted in the PubMed and Web of Science databases. After screening, 34 randomized controlled trials were included in the final analyses, involving a total of 1455 participants. Results A random‐effects model showed a significant effect of EX on FFM, with a pooled mean difference favouring CR combined with EX over CR alone (mean difference (MD) = +0.87 kg; 95% confidence interval (CI): +0.59, +1.16 kg; p ≤ 0.001). On average, EX prevented nearly half of FFM loss (45.7%). While subgroup testing found no significant differences between training modes, point estimates suggested greater benefits when the intervention included strength training. An additional network meta‐analysis, conducted to account for the repeated use of the same control group in multi‐arm studies, revealed that mixed training yielded the largest effect (MD = +1.20 kg, 95% CI: +0.67, +1.73 kg; p < 0.001, P‐score = 0.93), followed by strength training (MD = +0.83 kg, 95% CI: +0.17, +1.49; p = 0.013; P‐score = 0.66), while endurance training fell just short of statistical significance (MD = +0.51 kg, 95% CI: −0.04, +1.05; p = 0.067; P‐score = 0.41). Only two studies reported SMM, both indicating muscle‐preserving effects of EX. Conclusions Exercise training is very effective in reducing FFM loss during CR. The present study provides valuable new insights for optimizing weight loss strategies. Trail Registration CRD420251058428

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism
Published
2026-05-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.70873
Primary Topic
Adipose Tissue and Metabolism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of Calorie Restriction With and Without Strength, Endurance or Mixed Training on Fat‐Free and Skeletal Muscle Mass in Overweight or Obese Individuals—A Systematic Review With Pairwise Meta‐Analysis and Network Meta‐Analysis of Randomized Cont

Steffen Held, Magdalena Deller, Christian Brinkmann, Jan Weiershaus
Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism
Adipose Tissue and Metabolism
article

Effects of Calorie Restriction With and Without Strength, Endurance or Mixed Training on Fat‐Free and Skeletal Muscle Mass in Overweight or Obese Individuals—A Systematic Review With Pairwise Meta‐Analysis and Network Meta‐Analysis of Randomized Cont

Steffen Held, Magdalena Deller, Christian Brinkmann, Jan Weiershaus
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Aims Calorie restriction (CR) reduces both fat mass and fat‐free mass (FFM), particularly skeletal muscle mass (SMM), which is essential for cardiometabolic health and preventing frailty. This study compares CR alone versus CR plus exercise (EX) on FFM and SMM in overweight/obese patients and examines the effects of different training modes. Methods A systematic literature search was conducted in the PubMed and Web of Science databases. After screening, 34 randomized controlled trials were included in the final analyses, involving a total of 1455 participants. Results A random‐effects model showed a significant effect of EX on FFM, with a pooled mean difference favouring CR combined with EX over CR alone (mean difference (MD) = +0.87 kg; 95% confidence interval (CI): +0.59, +1.16 kg; p ≤ 0.001). On average, EX prevented nearly half of FFM loss (45.7%). While subgroup testing found no significant differences between training modes, point estimates suggested greater benefits when the intervention included strength training. An additional network meta‐analysis, conducted to account for the repeated use of the same control group in multi‐arm studies, revealed that mixed training yielded the largest effect (MD = +1.20 kg, 95% CI: +0.67, +1.73 kg; p < 0.001, P‐score = 0.93), followed by strength training (MD = +0.83 kg, 95% CI: +0.17, +1.49; p = 0.013; P‐score = 0.66), while endurance training fell just short of statistical significance (MD = +0.51 kg, 95% CI: −0.04, +1.05; p = 0.067; P‐score = 0.41). Only two studies reported SMM, both indicating muscle‐preserving effects of EX. Conclusions Exercise training is very effective in reducing FFM loss during CR. The present study provides valuable new insights for optimizing weight loss strategies. Trail Registration CRD420251058428

Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism
German Sport University Cologne (DE), Hochschule Düsseldorf University of Applied Sciences (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Adipose Tissue and Metabolism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.