"Babies being killed": A pragma-dialectical analysis of Biden's justification for the war on Gaza

The escalation of war in the Gaza strip, following the October 7, 2023 Hamas attack has reignited questions about the justifications of disproportionate violence. In the wake of the attack, Israel launched a large-scale ground invasion that has left thousands of civilian deaths. President Biden responded with unwavering support for Israel. Through a pragma dialectical analysis of Biden’s early speeches, this study interrogates the argumentation strategies deployed to legitimise Israel’s aggression on over two million civilian residents. Analysis reveals that Biden’s rhetoric derailed from measured condemnation into feardriven moral polarization that invokes Holocaust and 9/11 memories to transform moral support into an international ‘duty’ to defend the “Jews around the world”. Each statement builds upon its predecessor to progressively marshal ad hominem and ad-baculum arguments that justify an “overwhelming” war. The findings contribute insights into the way language may be deployed in political discourse to mask asymmetries in power and suffering and eventually effect a shift from moral alignment into coercive persuasion in the justification of state violence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-05-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20262132
Primary Topic
Rhetoric and Communication Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

"Babies being killed": A pragma-dialectical analysis of Biden's justification for the war on Gaza

Gibreel Sadeq Alaghbary
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Rhetoric and Communication Studies
article

"Babies being killed": A pragma-dialectical analysis of Biden's justification for the war on Gaza

Gibreel Sadeq Alaghbary
article en

Abstract

The escalation of war in the Gaza strip, following the October 7, 2023 Hamas attack has reignited questions about the justifications of disproportionate violence. In the wake of the attack, Israel launched a large-scale ground invasion that has left thousands of civilian deaths. President Biden responded with unwavering support for Israel. Through a pragma dialectical analysis of Biden’s early speeches, this study interrogates the argumentation strategies deployed to legitimise Israel’s aggression on over two million civilian residents. Analysis reveals that Biden’s rhetoric derailed from measured condemnation into feardriven moral polarization that invokes Holocaust and 9/11 memories to transform moral support into an international ‘duty’ to defend the “Jews around the world”. Each statement builds upon its predecessor to progressively marshal ad hominem and ad-baculum arguments that justify an “overwhelming” war. The findings contribute insights into the way language may be deployed in political discourse to mask asymmetries in power and suffering and eventually effect a shift from moral alignment into coercive persuasion in the justification of state violence.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Qassim University (SA)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Rhetoric and Communication Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.