Antidepressant use and colorectal cancer risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis of epidemiological studies

We conducted a systematic search of observational studies published up to March 2026 in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science. Meta-analyses were performed using robust variance estimation to pool adjusted estimates from included studies. Subgroup analyses were conducted to explore variations in risk by type of antidepressant (AD), study design, and geographic region. Dose-response analysis assessed the relationship between dose levels and colorectal cancer (CRC) risk. Fifteen studies involving millions of participants were included. The meta-analysis showed a significantly lower CRC risk associated with AD use with a pooled odds ratio (OR) of 0.88 (95% CI: 0.87, 0.95) and a pooled hazard ratio (HR) of 0.85 (95% CI: 0.74, 0.97). Specifically, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and tricyclic antidepressant (TCAs) were associated with a lower CRC risk (both pooled OR estimated at 0.90; 95%CI: 0.84, 0.96), while results for other AD classes were non-significant and require cautious interpretation due to limited sample sizes. Furthermore, dose level stratification and exposure duration-response analyses identified no statistically significant relationship between AD exposure pattern and CRC risk. Findings suggest that AD use, particularly SSRIs and TCAs, may be associated with decreased CRC risk, highlighting the potential for ADs to serve a dual role in treating mental health conditions and a preventive effect against CRC.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Neuropsychopharmacology
Published
2026-05-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroneuro.2026.112873
Primary Topic
Cancer, Stress, Anesthesia, and Immune Response
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Antidepressant use and colorectal cancer risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis of epidemiological studies

Cuiling Wei, Francisco Tsz Tsun Lai, Peng Wu, Oscar Mahasriariyawong
European Neuropsychopharmacology
Cancer, Stress, Anesthesia, and Immune Response
article

Antidepressant use and colorectal cancer risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis of epidemiological studies

Cuiling Wei, Francisco Tsz Tsun Lai, Peng Wu, Oscar Mahasriariyawong
article en

Abstract

We conducted a systematic search of observational studies published up to March 2026 in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science. Meta-analyses were performed using robust variance estimation to pool adjusted estimates from included studies. Subgroup analyses were conducted to explore variations in risk by type of antidepressant (AD), study design, and geographic region. Dose-response analysis assessed the relationship between dose levels and colorectal cancer (CRC) risk. Fifteen studies involving millions of participants were included. The meta-analysis showed a significantly lower CRC risk associated with AD use with a pooled odds ratio (OR) of 0.88 (95% CI: 0.87, 0.95) and a pooled hazard ratio (HR) of 0.85 (95% CI: 0.74, 0.97). Specifically, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and tricyclic antidepressant (TCAs) were associated with a lower CRC risk (both pooled OR estimated at 0.90; 95%CI: 0.84, 0.96), while results for other AD classes were non-significant and require cautious interpretation due to limited sample sizes. Furthermore, dose level stratification and exposure duration-response analyses identified no statistically significant relationship between AD exposure pattern and CRC risk. Findings suggest that AD use, particularly SSRIs and TCAs, may be associated with decreased CRC risk, highlighting the potential for ADs to serve a dual role in treating mental health conditions and a preventive effect against CRC.

European NeuropsychopharmacologyVol. 111
University of Hong Kong (HK)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Cancer, Stress, Anesthesia, and Immune Response
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.