Epistemic Corrigibility: Institutional Design for Epistemically Conservative AI Systems

This paper introduces the concept of epistemic corrigibility — the institutional capacity and obligation to recognize when an AI system is reproducing outdated, inadequate, or epistemically unjust knowledge structures, even when technically correct, and to revise or replace it accordingly. Building on a companion paper establishing that AI systems are structurally epistemically conservative, this paper takes the normative step that analysis left open. Democratic theoretical foundations are developed through Habermas's communicative rationality, Dewey's democratic epistemology, and Christiano's epistemic account of democratic authority. Five institutional design principles are derived: epistemic audit requirements, categorical diversity mandates, epistemic sunset provisions, mandatory human interpretive oversight, and transparency of paradigmatic commitments. These principles are situated within existing governance frameworks, particularly the EU AI Act. The paper argues that contemporary failures of AI governance are primarily failures of epistemic institutional design, and that epistemic corrigibility — understood as a normative institutional design principle — is a necessary condition of democratic legitimacy in high-stakes AI deployment.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-05-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20262088
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Epistemic Corrigibility: Institutional Design for Epistemically Conservative AI Systems

Burhan Dinler
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
preprint

Epistemic Corrigibility: Institutional Design for Epistemically Conservative AI Systems

Burhan Dinler
preprint en

Abstract

This paper introduces the concept of epistemic corrigibility — the institutional capacity and obligation to recognize when an AI system is reproducing outdated, inadequate, or epistemically unjust knowledge structures, even when technically correct, and to revise or replace it accordingly. Building on a companion paper establishing that AI systems are structurally epistemically conservative, this paper takes the normative step that analysis left open. Democratic theoretical foundations are developed through Habermas's communicative rationality, Dewey's democratic epistemology, and Christiano's epistemic account of democratic authority. Five institutional design principles are derived: epistemic audit requirements, categorical diversity mandates, epistemic sunset provisions, mandatory human interpretive oversight, and transparency of paradigmatic commitments. These principles are situated within existing governance frameworks, particularly the EU AI Act. The paper argues that contemporary failures of AI governance are primarily failures of epistemic institutional design, and that epistemic corrigibility — understood as a normative institutional design principle — is a necessary condition of democratic legitimacy in high-stakes AI deployment.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.