Functional outcomes after retransfer following endovascular thrombectomy in a hub-and-spoke stroke network

BACKGROUND: Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is a time-sensitive treatment for acute ischemic stroke, and hub-and-spoke systems have expanded patient access to this intervention. However, overcrowding at comprehensive stroke centers (CSCs) remains a significant challenge, particularly in regions with limited resources. Immediate retransfer of patients to spoke hospitals after EVT could help alleviate capacity strain, yet evidence on the safety and outcomes of this practice is limited. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients who underwent EVT at a tertiary stroke center in Bucharest, Romania, between June 2024 and October 2025, all of whom were transferred from regional spoke hospitals. Patients were classified as 'retransferred' if they returned immediately to the referring hospital, or as 'kept' if they remained at the CSC. The primary outcome was the 3-month modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score, analyzed as an ordinal variable. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to adjust for confounding by indication, and secondary outcomes included functional independence (mRS 0-2), mortality, and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). RESULTS: Of 305 patients, 194 (63.6%) were retransferred and 111 (36.4%) remained at the CSC. Transfer distance was the strongest differentiator between groups. After IPTW adjustment that included transport distance, no significant difference was observed in the ordinal mRS distribution (adjusted common OR 1.30, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.77, P=0.104). Functional independence rates (26.3% vs 34.7%, P=0.250) and sICH rates (13.0% vs 16.9%, P=0.579) were comparable between groups. CONCLUSION: Immediate retransfer to spoke centers after EVT did not result in a significant difference in functional outcomes. Further larger studies that include data on hemodynamic stability and respiratory status are needed to establish definitively the safety of retransfer after thrombectomy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery
Published
2026-05-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/jnis-2026-025430
Primary Topic
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Functional outcomes after retransfer following endovascular thrombectomy in a hub-and-spoke stroke network

Anca Negrilă, Răzvan Alexandru Radu, Andreea Ioana Mușuroi, Elena Oana Terecoasa et al.
Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
article

Functional outcomes after retransfer following endovascular thrombectomy in a hub-and-spoke stroke network

Anca Negrilă, Răzvan Alexandru Radu, Andreea Ioana Mușuroi, Elena Oana Terecoasa, Cristina Tiu, Alex-Cristian Liteanu, Ruxandra Gabriela Iatan, Bogdan Dorobat, Vlad-Romeo Mihalcea
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is a time-sensitive treatment for acute ischemic stroke, and hub-and-spoke systems have expanded patient access to this intervention. However, overcrowding at comprehensive stroke centers (CSCs) remains a significant challenge, particularly in regions with limited resources. Immediate retransfer of patients to spoke hospitals after EVT could help alleviate capacity strain, yet evidence on the safety and outcomes of this practice is limited. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients who underwent EVT at a tertiary stroke center in Bucharest, Romania, between June 2024 and October 2025, all of whom were transferred from regional spoke hospitals. Patients were classified as 'retransferred' if they returned immediately to the referring hospital, or as 'kept' if they remained at the CSC. The primary outcome was the 3-month modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score, analyzed as an ordinal variable. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to adjust for confounding by indication, and secondary outcomes included functional independence (mRS 0-2), mortality, and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). RESULTS: Of 305 patients, 194 (63.6%) were retransferred and 111 (36.4%) remained at the CSC. Transfer distance was the strongest differentiator between groups. After IPTW adjustment that included transport distance, no significant difference was observed in the ordinal mRS distribution (adjusted common OR 1.30, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.77, P=0.104). Functional independence rates (26.3% vs 34.7%, P=0.250) and sICH rates (13.0% vs 16.9%, P=0.579) were comparable between groups. CONCLUSION: Immediate retransfer to spoke centers after EVT did not result in a significant difference in functional outcomes. Further larger studies that include data on hemodynamic stability and respiratory status are needed to establish definitively the safety of retransfer after thrombectomy.

Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery
Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy (RO), Clinical Emergency Hospital Bucharest (RO), Emergency University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.