Clinical Outcomes in Concurrent Cohorts of Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor (ELX/TEZ/IVA)-Treated versus ELX/TEZ/IVA-Ineligible Individuals with Cystic Fibrosis in the US during COVID-19

The initial US launch of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ELX/TEZ/IVA) coincided with the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, altering healthcare-seeking behaviors and possibly resulting in decreased respiratory infection transmission. We evaluated real-world effectiveness of ELX/TEZ/IVA, accounting for potential impact of COVID-19 by comparing outcomes in people with cystic fibrosis (CF) treated with ELX/TEZ/IVA with ELX/TEZ/IVA-ineligible people with CF. This retrospective, observational study used US CF Foundation Patient Registry data (2017–2021) of people with CF aged ≥ 12 years initiating ELX/TEZ/IVA between Q4 2019 and Q3 2021 and a concurrent comparator cohort ineligible for ELX/TEZ/IVA. Primary outcomes (follow-up through 2021 or death) included change in percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s (ppFEV1) from baseline over follow-up, annualized rate of ppFEV1 decline, rate of pulmonary exacerbations (PEx), time to lung transplantation, and overall survival. ppFEV1 increased in ELX/TEZ/IVA-treated individuals through follow-up but decreased in the comparator cohort (+6.20 versus −3.13 percentage points, respectively; mean difference 9.34, 95% confidence interval [CI] 8.84 to 9.85). The annualized rate of ppFEV1 change was −0.03 (95% CI −0.18 to 0.07) in the ELX/TEZ/IVA-treated cohort and −2.24 (95% CI −2.66 to −1.80) in the comparator cohort (relative reduction in rate of decline of 99%; 95% CI 92–103%). Rates of PEx requiring intravenous antibiotics or hospitalization were 0.17 and 0.77 among ELX/TEZ/IVA-treated and comparator cohorts, respectively (77% reduction, 95% CI 74–81%). Proportion undergoing lung transplant was 0.22% and 2.94% in ELX/TEZ/IVA-treated and comparator cohorts, respectively (90% reduction, 95% CI 29–98%). All-cause mortality was 0.76% and 3.45% in ELX/TEZ/IVA-treated and comparator cohorts, respectively (79% reduction; 95% CI 56–88%). During COVID-19, ELX/TEZ/IVA-ineligible people with CF experienced lung function decline and higher rates of PEx, lung transplant, and death versus the ELX/TEZ/IVA-treated cohort, despite infection prevention measures, suggesting ELX/TEZ/IVA’s benefits remain despite the potential bias from protective effects of the pandemic.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pulmonary Therapy
Published
2026-05-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s41030-026-00363-0
Primary Topic
Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical Outcomes in Concurrent Cohorts of Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor (ELX/TEZ/IVA)-Treated versus ELX/TEZ/IVA-Ineligible Individuals with Cystic Fibrosis in the US during COVID-19

Aruna Muthukumar, Yiyue Lou, Lisa J. McGarry, Maral DerSarkissian et al.
Pulmonary Therapy
Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances
article

Clinical Outcomes in Concurrent Cohorts of Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor (ELX/TEZ/IVA)-Treated versus ELX/TEZ/IVA-Ineligible Individuals with Cystic Fibrosis in the US during COVID-19

Aruna Muthukumar, Yiyue Lou, Lisa J. McGarry, Maral DerSarkissian, Kate Van Brunt, Hela Romdhani, C Merlo
article en

Abstract

The initial US launch of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ELX/TEZ/IVA) coincided with the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, altering healthcare-seeking behaviors and possibly resulting in decreased respiratory infection transmission. We evaluated real-world effectiveness of ELX/TEZ/IVA, accounting for potential impact of COVID-19 by comparing outcomes in people with cystic fibrosis (CF) treated with ELX/TEZ/IVA with ELX/TEZ/IVA-ineligible people with CF. This retrospective, observational study used US CF Foundation Patient Registry data (2017–2021) of people with CF aged ≥ 12 years initiating ELX/TEZ/IVA between Q4 2019 and Q3 2021 and a concurrent comparator cohort ineligible for ELX/TEZ/IVA. Primary outcomes (follow-up through 2021 or death) included change in percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s (ppFEV1) from baseline over follow-up, annualized rate of ppFEV1 decline, rate of pulmonary exacerbations (PEx), time to lung transplantation, and overall survival. ppFEV1 increased in ELX/TEZ/IVA-treated individuals through follow-up but decreased in the comparator cohort (+6.20 versus −3.13 percentage points, respectively; mean difference 9.34, 95% confidence interval [CI] 8.84 to 9.85). The annualized rate of ppFEV1 change was −0.03 (95% CI −0.18 to 0.07) in the ELX/TEZ/IVA-treated cohort and −2.24 (95% CI −2.66 to −1.80) in the comparator cohort (relative reduction in rate of decline of 99%; 95% CI 92–103%). Rates of PEx requiring intravenous antibiotics or hospitalization were 0.17 and 0.77 among ELX/TEZ/IVA-treated and comparator cohorts, respectively (77% reduction, 95% CI 74–81%). Proportion undergoing lung transplant was 0.22% and 2.94% in ELX/TEZ/IVA-treated and comparator cohorts, respectively (90% reduction, 95% CI 29–98%). All-cause mortality was 0.76% and 3.45% in ELX/TEZ/IVA-treated and comparator cohorts, respectively (79% reduction; 95% CI 56–88%). During COVID-19, ELX/TEZ/IVA-ineligible people with CF experienced lung function decline and higher rates of PEx, lung transplant, and death versus the ELX/TEZ/IVA-treated cohort, despite infection prevention measures, suggesting ELX/TEZ/IVA’s benefits remain despite the potential bias from protective effects of the pandemic.

Pulmonary Therapy
Johns Hopkins University (US), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US), Vertex Pharmaceuticals (United States) (US), Analysis Group (United States) (US)
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation, Vertex Pharmaceuticals
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.