Covering Up for Coworkers: A Scale Development and Empirical Examination of Relational Cover‐Up Behavior

ABSTRACT Why do employees conceal their coworkers' unethical behavior and who is most likely to do so? To address these questions, we begin by developing and validating a psychometrically robust measure of relational cover‐up behavior (Study 1). Using a two‐wave study ( N = 475), we then test the argument that employees may experience an identity threat in response to witnessing a coworker engaging in unethical behavior, which can motivate employees to cover up the coworker's unethical behavior, especially when they closely identify with the coworker (Study 2). Theoretical implications include identifying the process through which relational cover‐up behaviors can emerge, when they are especially likely to do so, and the detrimental consequences of coworker identification for relational cover‐up behavior. Our research also provides the methodological foundation for scholars to empirically study relational cover‐up behaviors, while offering practical guidance to manage these pervasive and damaging behaviors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Organizational Behavior
Published
2026-05-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/job.70094
Primary Topic
Ethics in Business and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Covering Up for Coworkers: A Scale Development and Empirical Examination of Relational Cover‐Up Behavior

Jenny H. Wang, Annika Hillebrandt, Laurie J. Barclay
Journal of Organizational Behavior
Ethics in Business and Education
article

Covering Up for Coworkers: A Scale Development and Empirical Examination of Relational Cover‐Up Behavior

Jenny H. Wang, Annika Hillebrandt, Laurie J. Barclay
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Why do employees conceal their coworkers' unethical behavior and who is most likely to do so? To address these questions, we begin by developing and validating a psychometrically robust measure of relational cover‐up behavior (Study 1). Using a two‐wave study ( N = 475), we then test the argument that employees may experience an identity threat in response to witnessing a coworker engaging in unethical behavior, which can motivate employees to cover up the coworker's unethical behavior, especially when they closely identify with the coworker (Study 2). Theoretical implications include identifying the process through which relational cover‐up behaviors can emerge, when they are especially likely to do so, and the detrimental consequences of coworker identification for relational cover‐up behavior. Our research also provides the methodological foundation for scholars to empirically study relational cover‐up behaviors, while offering practical guidance to manage these pervasive and damaging behaviors.

Journal of Organizational Behavior
University of Waterloo (CA), University of Guelph (CA)
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Ethics in Business and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.