Sibling cooperation in boreal owls during the post-fledging dependence period

BACKGROUND: Many vertebrates develop in the company of their siblings, a social context that profoundly influences their life histories and phenotypes. While avian begging behaviour in parent-offspring conflict and sibling competition/cooperation have been largely studied in nestlings, the fledglings' begging remains under-researched, despite the continued dependency of young birds throughout the post-fledging dependence period (PFDP). Siblings typically maintain close proximity during the PFDP, a pattern that might be explained by the following four mutually non-exclusive hypotheses: competition over the prey delivered by parents (competition, H1), mutual affection established during the nestling period (cooperation-friendship, H2), various antipredation behaviours (cooperation-antipredation, H3) or begging negotiation about whose need is greater (cooperation-negotiation, H4). RESULTS: We radio-tracked 123 boreal owl (Aegolius funereus) fledglings from 34 nests over 6 years in Czechia and Finland and recorded daily inter-sibling distances throughout the PFDP. Distances were longer in Czechia than in Finland during both night (82 ± 81 vs 56 ± 65 m; mean ± SD) and day (75 ± 109 vs 64 ± 86 m). In both areas, distances increased with an augmenting time gap in tracking, siblings' age and the number of present siblings at night but decreased during the day. These consistent patterns across different environments indicate that the life history of the target species prevails over the environmental effects. Consistent with the predictions of the cooperation-antipredation hypothesis (H3), the mean inter-sibling distances were shorter in Finland compared to Czechia during both day and night, and inter-sibling distances were shorter within larger sibling flocks during the day. The cooperation-negotiation hypothesis (H4) is supported by the finding that vocally begging siblings were closer to each other than their non-begging counterparts. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate, for the first time, that sibling cooperation can occur during the PFDP, when offspring are vulnerable to predators, both during diurnal roosting and at night while begging for food. We conclude that the inter-sibling distances in boreal owls during the PFDP are maintained because siblings cooperate through collective antipredation behaviour during diurnal roosting and through collective negotiation over access to the indivisible prey items delivered by their parent during nocturnal activity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Biology
Published
2026-05-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-026-02626-3
Primary Topic
Avian ecology and behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sibling cooperation in boreal owls during the post-fledging dependence period

Simona Stehlíková Sovadinová, Luděk Bartoš, Michal Ševčík, Filip Tulis et al.
BMC Biology
Avian ecology and behavior
article

Sibling cooperation in boreal owls during the post-fledging dependence period

Simona Stehlíková Sovadinová, Luděk Bartoš, Michal Ševčík, Filip Tulis, Marek Kouba, Erkki Korpimäki, Jitka Bartošová
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many vertebrates develop in the company of their siblings, a social context that profoundly influences their life histories and phenotypes. While avian begging behaviour in parent-offspring conflict and sibling competition/cooperation have been largely studied in nestlings, the fledglings' begging remains under-researched, despite the continued dependency of young birds throughout the post-fledging dependence period (PFDP). Siblings typically maintain close proximity during the PFDP, a pattern that might be explained by the following four mutually non-exclusive hypotheses: competition over the prey delivered by parents (competition, H1), mutual affection established during the nestling period (cooperation-friendship, H2), various antipredation behaviours (cooperation-antipredation, H3) or begging negotiation about whose need is greater (cooperation-negotiation, H4). RESULTS: We radio-tracked 123 boreal owl (Aegolius funereus) fledglings from 34 nests over 6 years in Czechia and Finland and recorded daily inter-sibling distances throughout the PFDP. Distances were longer in Czechia than in Finland during both night (82 ± 81 vs 56 ± 65 m; mean ± SD) and day (75 ± 109 vs 64 ± 86 m). In both areas, distances increased with an augmenting time gap in tracking, siblings' age and the number of present siblings at night but decreased during the day. These consistent patterns across different environments indicate that the life history of the target species prevails over the environmental effects. Consistent with the predictions of the cooperation-antipredation hypothesis (H3), the mean inter-sibling distances were shorter in Finland compared to Czechia during both day and night, and inter-sibling distances were shorter within larger sibling flocks during the day. The cooperation-negotiation hypothesis (H4) is supported by the finding that vocally begging siblings were closer to each other than their non-begging counterparts. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate, for the first time, that sibling cooperation can occur during the PFDP, when offspring are vulnerable to predators, both during diurnal roosting and at night while begging for food. We conclude that the inter-sibling distances in boreal owls during the PFDP are maintained because siblings cooperate through collective antipredation behaviour during diurnal roosting and through collective negotiation over access to the indivisible prey items delivered by their parent during nocturnal activity.

BMC Biology
University of Turku (FI), Czech University of Life Sciences Prague (CZ), Masaryk University (CZ), Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra (SK), Institute of Animal Science (CZ), Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Vertebrate Biology (CZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Avian ecology and behavior
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.