Pressor Response Index During Blood Return as a Marker for Identifying Intradialytic Hypotension

ABSTRACT Background Intradialytic hypotension (IDH) is a frequent complication of hemodialysis (HD). Although nadir blood pressure–based definitions are prognostically relevant, their use in daily practice is limited because accurate identification requires frequent blood pressure monitoring. Because blood pressure (BP) is routinely measured during HD, the magnitude of the systolic BP rise during blood return may provide a simple and practical marker for identifying IDH. Methods This cross‐sectional study was conducted at a single HD center. Study 1 evaluated factors associated with the pressor response index in 53 HD patients across 159 sessions using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). Study 2 examined the ability of the index to discriminate HD sessions with and without IDH as defined by McCausland et al. Results The pressor response index was significantly associated with maximum systolic BP drop and hypovolemic symptoms. The index clearly distinguished sessions with and without IDH. The effect size was large (Cohen's d = 1.41), and ROC analysis showed good discrimination (AUC 0.823). The optimal cut‐off value was 10.3% (sensitivity 0.84, specificity 0.65). Conclusion The pressor response index may represent a simple, objective, and practical marker for identifying IDH in routine clinical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Hemodialysis International
Published
2026-05-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/hdi.70083
Primary Topic
Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pressor Response Index During Blood Return as a Marker for Identifying Intradialytic Hypotension

Takahiro Shinzato, Junji Uchino, Takeshi Nakata, Kazuhiko Shibata et al.
Hemodialysis International
Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
article

Pressor Response Index During Blood Return as a Marker for Identifying Intradialytic Hypotension

Takahiro Shinzato, Junji Uchino, Takeshi Nakata, Kazuhiko Shibata, Takahito Ito, Motoyuki Masai, Atsushi Kato, Hirotaka Shibata, 赤澤愛, Shota Yoshizawa, Shigeru Nakai, Tomoya Horiba, Daiki Sugiyama
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Intradialytic hypotension (IDH) is a frequent complication of hemodialysis (HD). Although nadir blood pressure–based definitions are prognostically relevant, their use in daily practice is limited because accurate identification requires frequent blood pressure monitoring. Because blood pressure (BP) is routinely measured during HD, the magnitude of the systolic BP rise during blood return may provide a simple and practical marker for identifying IDH. Methods This cross‐sectional study was conducted at a single HD center. Study 1 evaluated factors associated with the pressor response index in 53 HD patients across 159 sessions using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). Study 2 examined the ability of the index to discriminate HD sessions with and without IDH as defined by McCausland et al. Results The pressor response index was significantly associated with maximum systolic BP drop and hypovolemic symptoms. The index clearly distinguished sessions with and without IDH. The effect size was large (Cohen's d = 1.41), and ROC analysis showed good discrimination (AUC 0.823). The optimal cut‐off value was 10.3% (sensitivity 0.84, specificity 0.65). Conclusion The pressor response index may represent a simple, objective, and practical marker for identifying IDH in routine clinical practice.

Hemodialysis International
Aichi University (JP), Oita University (JP), Kobe University Hospital (JP), Tomitahama Hospital (JP), Toyohashi Heart Center (JP), Chiba Hospital (JP), Nagoya Medical Center (JP), Hamamatsu Medical Center (JP), Toin University of Yokohama (JP), Yokohama City University (JP), Oita University of Nursing and Health Sciences (JP)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.