The Constructibility Framework: Collapse Boundaries, Early Warning, and Dynamic Resource Trajectories in Neural Learning Systems. A Six-Paper Research Monograph

This monograph collects and unifies the six-paper Constructibility research programme (2026), which addresses a fundamental question in the deployment of neural learning systems: can learning collapse be predicted, monitored, and characterised before accuracy failure occurs -- and under what resource conditions can collapse be prevented or reversed?The Constructibility Framework characterises learning collapse as a function of three resource parameters: corruption intensity H, model capacity C, and dataset size n. The central result is the power-law effective capacity constraint L(S) = C^beta * n^gamma / H^alpha (with fitted exponents alpha = 1.42, beta = 0.31, gamma = 0.47) and the sharp collapse boundary H_crit(C,n) = (C^beta * n^gamma)^{1/alpha}.The six papers develop this foundation through: (1) static boundary characterisation with empirical scaling law (AUC 0.91); (2) margin-based early warning M(t) = log L(S)(t) - log R(S)(t) with provable lead-time guarantees; (3) proxy-calibrated monitoring under natural distribution shift (AUC 0.84); (4) multi-agent cascade and synchronization theory (AUC 0.86); (5) fully unsupervised zero-shot deployment monitoring on real longitudinal data (AUC 0.79); (6) Dynamic Constructibility Theory covering hysteresis, metastability, and recovery conditions under time-varying (H(t), C(t), n(t)).Three additional chapters extend the framework into Constructibility Survival Theory (Cox hazard model; concordance index 0.82), Constructibility Control Theory (viability kernel and feedback intervention), and a formal identifiability analysis showing that only the effective stress phi(t) = H(t)^alpha is identifiable from observables -- retroactively stabilising the theoretical foundations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-05-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20252205
Primary Topic
Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

The Constructibility Framework: Collapse Boundaries, Early Warning, and Dynamic Resource Trajectories in Neural Learning Systems. A Six-Paper Research Monograph

Rahid Alekberli, Hikmat Karimov
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
preprint

The Constructibility Framework: Collapse Boundaries, Early Warning, and Dynamic Resource Trajectories in Neural Learning Systems. A Six-Paper Research Monograph

Rahid Alekberli, Hikmat Karimov
preprint en

Abstract

This monograph collects and unifies the six-paper Constructibility research programme (2026), which addresses a fundamental question in the deployment of neural learning systems: can learning collapse be predicted, monitored, and characterised before accuracy failure occurs -- and under what resource conditions can collapse be prevented or reversed?The Constructibility Framework characterises learning collapse as a function of three resource parameters: corruption intensity H, model capacity C, and dataset size n. The central result is the power-law effective capacity constraint L(S) = C^beta * n^gamma / H^alpha (with fitted exponents alpha = 1.42, beta = 0.31, gamma = 0.47) and the sharp collapse boundary H_crit(C,n) = (C^beta * n^gamma)^{1/alpha}.The six papers develop this foundation through: (1) static boundary characterisation with empirical scaling law (AUC 0.91); (2) margin-based early warning M(t) = log L(S)(t) - log R(S)(t) with provable lead-time guarantees; (3) proxy-calibrated monitoring under natural distribution shift (AUC 0.84); (4) multi-agent cascade and synchronization theory (AUC 0.86); (5) fully unsupervised zero-shot deployment monitoring on real longitudinal data (AUC 0.79); (6) Dynamic Constructibility Theory covering hysteresis, metastability, and recovery conditions under time-varying (H(t), C(t), n(t)).Three additional chapters extend the framework into Constructibility Survival Theory (Cox hazard model; concordance index 0.82), Constructibility Control Theory (viability kernel and feedback intervention), and a formal identifiability analysis showing that only the effective stress phi(t) = H(t)^alpha is identifiable from observables -- retroactively stabilising the theoretical foundations.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Azerbaijan Technical University (AZ)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.