Deep learning strategies for estimating retinal thickness from fundus images: a comparative study with multi-device data

Color fundus photographs (CFPs) are widely used for diabetic retinopathy (DR) screening due to accessibility. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) provides complementary depth-resolved retinal structure information but is less practical for large-scale screening, especially due to its cost. This study presents a deep learning framework based on a foundation model (FM) to estimate OCT-derived total retinal thickness (TRT) maps directly from CFPs, without preprocessing steps such as region registration. RETFound was used as the backbone FM, and the AI-READI dataset with paired CFPs and OCT scans from two devices (Topcon Maestro2 and Triton) was used for training and evaluation. Additional training data came from OCTA-500 and EyePACS. Three decoder training strategies for TRT estimation were compared: Individual, Combination, and Random Selection. Device-derived OCT TRT maps showed a significant inter-device thickness difference, with Maestro2 measuring on average more than 30 µm thicker than Triton. Individual and Combination models achieved low bias (relative difference about 5%) against device-specific references. The Random Selection model converged toward the average TRT distribution between Maestro2 and Triton, demonstrating robustness to device variability. The proposed FM-based framework bridges CFP and OCT by estimating retinal thickness from CFPs without OCT.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-05-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-51728-z
Primary Topic
Retinal Imaging and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deep learning strategies for estimating retinal thickness from fundus images: a comparative study with multi-device data

Nikhil Gadiraju, Judy E. Kim, Noriyoshi Takahashi, Yi-Xiang Wang
Scientific Reports
Retinal Imaging and Analysis
article

Deep learning strategies for estimating retinal thickness from fundus images: a comparative study with multi-device data

Nikhil Gadiraju, Judy E. Kim, Noriyoshi Takahashi, Yi-Xiang Wang
article en

Abstract

Color fundus photographs (CFPs) are widely used for diabetic retinopathy (DR) screening due to accessibility. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) provides complementary depth-resolved retinal structure information but is less practical for large-scale screening, especially due to its cost. This study presents a deep learning framework based on a foundation model (FM) to estimate OCT-derived total retinal thickness (TRT) maps directly from CFPs, without preprocessing steps such as region registration. RETFound was used as the backbone FM, and the AI-READI dataset with paired CFPs and OCT scans from two devices (Topcon Maestro2 and Triton) was used for training and evaluation. Additional training data came from OCTA-500 and EyePACS. Three decoder training strategies for TRT estimation were compared: Individual, Combination, and Random Selection. Device-derived OCT TRT maps showed a significant inter-device thickness difference, with Maestro2 measuring on average more than 30 µm thicker than Triton. Individual and Combination models achieved low bias (relative difference about 5%) against device-specific references. The Random Selection model converged toward the average TRT distribution between Maestro2 and Triton, demonstrating robustness to device variability. The proposed FM-based framework bridges CFP and OCT by estimating retinal thickness from CFPs without OCT.

Scientific Reports
Southwestern Medical Center (US), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Research to Prevent Blindness, Georgia Clinical and Translational Science Alliance, National Institutes of Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Retinal Imaging and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.