Quality over quantity: biopsy-anchored CT radiogenomics models outperform all-lesion training in a multi-tumour cohort despite a smaller sample size

Abstract Objective Radiogenomics aims to non-invasively predict tumour genotypes from imaging, but most studies assume molecular homogeneity by assigning a single biopsy-derived label to all lesions within a patient. This approach risks substantial label noise given well-documented interlesional heterogeneity. We investigated whether anchoring training to biopsy-confirmed lesions improves radiogenomic model performance and generalisability. Materials and methods We retrospectively analysed 1646 patients (11473 segmented lesions) with contrast-enhanced CT and EGFR mutation status from next-generation sequencing at the Netherlands Cancer Institute, alongside an external NSCLC radiogenomics cohort ( n = 158). All visible lesions were segmented, and the exact biopsy site was matched to its segmentation. Radiomic features were extracted, and machine learning models were trained with three lesion selection strategies: all lesions, non-biopsied lesions only, and biopsy-confirmed lesions only. To disentangle label quality from sample size, we created size-matched variants (one lesion per patient) for all-lesion and non-biopsied strategies. Results All models achieved significant discrimination of EGFR status on internal validation (AUC = 0.62–0.68). However, performance of the all-lesion and non-biopsied models declined on external validation (AUC = 0.55–0.63), while the biopsy-anchored model maintained stable performance (AUC = 0.62), despite having only 1/10th of the training sample size. When training sets were size-matched, the biopsy-anchored approach significantly outperformed a model trained on all available lesions on external validation ( p = 0.037). Conclusions Radiogenomic models trained on biopsy-confirmed lesions outperform conventional all-lesion strategies in external validation, despite using an order of magnitude fewer samples. Prioritising lesion-level label fidelity can mitigate heterogeneity-driven noise, enhancing robustness and clinical translation of imaging-based genomic prediction. Key Points Question Does assigning biopsy-derived molecular labels to all lesions introduce heterogeneity-driven label noise that reduces the generalisability of radiogenomic models? Findings Models trained exclusively on biopsy-confirmed lesions demonstrated superior external generalisability compared with all-lesion approaches, despite being trained on substantially fewer samples. Clinical relevance Biopsy-anchored radiogenomics improves the reliability of non-invasive mutation prediction by accounting for tumour heterogeneity, potentially supporting clinical decision-making when tissue sampling is limited or molecular results are discordant across lesions. Graphical Abstract

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Radiology
Published
2026-05-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-026-12601-9
Primary Topic
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quality over quantity: biopsy-anchored CT radiogenomics models outperform all-lesion training in a multi-tumour cohort despite a smaller sample size

Nino Bogveradze, Warissara Jutidamrongphan, Federica Landolfi, Andrea Delli Pizzi et al.
European Radiology
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
article

Quality over quantity: biopsy-anchored CT radiogenomics models outperform all-lesion training in a multi-tumour cohort despite a smaller sample size

Nino Bogveradze, Warissara Jutidamrongphan, Federica Landolfi, Andrea Delli Pizzi, Sajjad Rostami, Zuhir Bodalal, Francesca Castagnoli, Olga Maxouri, Liliana Petrychenko, Diana Ivonne Rodríguez Sánchez, Julian Middelkoop, Thera Vanneste, Regina Beets-Tan, Nicolo Gennaro, Kalina Chupetlovska, Petur Snaebjornsson, Eun Kyoung Hong, Stephan Ursprung
article en

Abstract

Abstract Objective Radiogenomics aims to non-invasively predict tumour genotypes from imaging, but most studies assume molecular homogeneity by assigning a single biopsy-derived label to all lesions within a patient. This approach risks substantial label noise given well-documented interlesional heterogeneity. We investigated whether anchoring training to biopsy-confirmed lesions improves radiogenomic model performance and generalisability. Materials and methods We retrospectively analysed 1646 patients (11473 segmented lesions) with contrast-enhanced CT and EGFR mutation status from next-generation sequencing at the Netherlands Cancer Institute, alongside an external NSCLC radiogenomics cohort ( n = 158). All visible lesions were segmented, and the exact biopsy site was matched to its segmentation. Radiomic features were extracted, and machine learning models were trained with three lesion selection strategies: all lesions, non-biopsied lesions only, and biopsy-confirmed lesions only. To disentangle label quality from sample size, we created size-matched variants (one lesion per patient) for all-lesion and non-biopsied strategies. Results All models achieved significant discrimination of EGFR status on internal validation (AUC = 0.62–0.68). However, performance of the all-lesion and non-biopsied models declined on external validation (AUC = 0.55–0.63), while the biopsy-anchored model maintained stable performance (AUC = 0.62), despite having only 1/10th of the training sample size. When training sets were size-matched, the biopsy-anchored approach significantly outperformed a model trained on all available lesions on external validation ( p = 0.037). Conclusions Radiogenomic models trained on biopsy-confirmed lesions outperform conventional all-lesion strategies in external validation, despite using an order of magnitude fewer samples. Prioritising lesion-level label fidelity can mitigate heterogeneity-driven noise, enhancing robustness and clinical translation of imaging-based genomic prediction. Key Points Question Does assigning biopsy-derived molecular labels to all lesions introduce heterogeneity-driven label noise that reduces the generalisability of radiogenomic models? Findings Models trained exclusively on biopsy-confirmed lesions demonstrated superior external generalisability compared with all-lesion approaches, despite being trained on substantially fewer samples. Clinical relevance Biopsy-anchored radiogenomics improves the reliability of non-invasive mutation prediction by accounting for tumour heterogeneity, potentially supporting clinical decision-making when tissue sampling is limited or molecular results are discordant across lesions. Graphical Abstract

European Radiology
Northwestern University (US), University of Bern (CH), Institute of Cancer Research (GB), University of Iceland (IS), Palo Alto University (US), University of Southern Denmark (DK), Swedish American Hospital (US), Maastricht University Medical Centre (NL), University Hospital of Bern (CH), The Netherlands Cancer Institute (NL), Maastricht University (NL), University of Chieti-Pescara (IT), Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (CH), Oncode Institute (NL), Royal Marsden Hospital (GB), University of Tübingen (DE), Sapienza University of Rome (IT), Stanford University (US)
Nvidia, European Commission, H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions
Peace, Justice and strong institutions, Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.