Richness, rapport, and rigor in digital interviews: Rethinking methodological presence through the “pocket-size ethnographer” positionality

As our social world is increasingly digitized, what do sociologists gain by rethinking the privileged status of in-person interviews? This paper challenges the presumption that synchronous, Zoom-mediated interviews are second-best substitutes for in-person interview methods. Drawing on data from three qualitative studies ( N = 285), we explore how digital interviews and focus groups can foster rapport, generate rich data, and meet qualitative standards of rigor. Using Social Presence Theory, we develop the metaphor of the “pocket-size ethnographer,” a smaller-than-life, two-dimensional research presence that affords unique opportunities for deep listening, reduces power asymmetries, and democratizes conversations. We argue that the diminished “realness” that researchers take on in Zoom-mediated interviews can paradoxically enhance interpretive richness, and we call for a shift from deficit-centered framings of video-mediated interviews to a quality-centric approach that foregrounds methodological flexibility, rigor, and innovation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Qualitative Research
Published
2026-05-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14687941261442133
Primary Topic
Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Richness, rapport, and rigor in digital interviews: Rethinking methodological presence through the “pocket-size ethnographer” positionality

Josée Johnston, Maddalena Simeon, Rebecca Lennox
Qualitative Research
Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
article

Richness, rapport, and rigor in digital interviews: Rethinking methodological presence through the “pocket-size ethnographer” positionality

Josée Johnston, Maddalena Simeon, Rebecca Lennox
article en

Abstract

As our social world is increasingly digitized, what do sociologists gain by rethinking the privileged status of in-person interviews? This paper challenges the presumption that synchronous, Zoom-mediated interviews are second-best substitutes for in-person interview methods. Drawing on data from three qualitative studies ( N = 285), we explore how digital interviews and focus groups can foster rapport, generate rich data, and meet qualitative standards of rigor. Using Social Presence Theory, we develop the metaphor of the “pocket-size ethnographer,” a smaller-than-life, two-dimensional research presence that affords unique opportunities for deep listening, reduces power asymmetries, and democratizes conversations. We argue that the diminished “realness” that researchers take on in Zoom-mediated interviews can paradoxically enhance interpretive richness, and we call for a shift from deficit-centered framings of video-mediated interviews to a quality-centric approach that foregrounds methodological flexibility, rigor, and innovation.

Qualitative Research
University of Toronto (CA), University of Missouri–St. Louis (US)
University of Toronto, Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.