Inhibitory Circuits of the Sensorimotor Network are Not Modulated By Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Isolated Cervical Dystonia

Impaired cerebellar influence on motor cortical excitability and plasticity has been reported in cervical dystonia (CD) patients, accompanied by the absence of cerebellar brain inhibition (CBI). Polarity-specific modulation of CBI in healthy individuals using cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation (ctDCS) suggested that ctDCS could normalize abnormal cerebellar output and improve clinical symptom severity in CD. The objective of this study was to determine whether anodal or cathodal ctDCS can modulate neurophysiological parameters of cortico-cortical, cerebello-cortical or afferent inhibition and improve motor symptom severity in CD patients. Fifteen patients with isolated CD participated in a randomized, double-blinded crossover study consisting of three sessions of anodal, cathodal, or sham ctDCS. Before and after each intervention, motor symptom severity and inhibitory circuits of the sensorimotor network were investigated using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), including short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI), short-latency afferent inhibition (SAI) and CBI. Baseline TMS measurements showed inhibitory influence of SICI (p < 0.001) and SAI (p < 0.001) in CD patients, whereas CBI had no inhibitory effect (p = 0.281). The different ctDCS interventions caused no significant modulation in any of the inhibitory TMS paradigms investigated. Similarly, motor symptom severity remained unchanged after the ctDCS interventions. A single session of ctDCS was not effective to modulate inhibitory circuits of the sensorimotor network in isolated CD patients. Future studies focusing on repetitive ctDCS interventions or multifocal stimulation protocols are needed to assess the influence on network excitability and connectivity as well as on motor symptoms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Cerebellum
Published
2026-05-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12311-026-02024-z
Primary Topic
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Inhibitory Circuits of the Sensorimotor Network are Not Modulated By Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Isolated Cervical Dystonia

Simone Zittel, Ronak Rashedi, Mathias Gelderblom, Franca Peemöller et al.
The Cerebellum
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
article

Inhibitory Circuits of the Sensorimotor Network are Not Modulated By Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Isolated Cervical Dystonia

Simone Zittel, Ronak Rashedi, Mathias Gelderblom, Franca Peemöller, Kai Grimm
article en

Abstract

Impaired cerebellar influence on motor cortical excitability and plasticity has been reported in cervical dystonia (CD) patients, accompanied by the absence of cerebellar brain inhibition (CBI). Polarity-specific modulation of CBI in healthy individuals using cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation (ctDCS) suggested that ctDCS could normalize abnormal cerebellar output and improve clinical symptom severity in CD. The objective of this study was to determine whether anodal or cathodal ctDCS can modulate neurophysiological parameters of cortico-cortical, cerebello-cortical or afferent inhibition and improve motor symptom severity in CD patients. Fifteen patients with isolated CD participated in a randomized, double-blinded crossover study consisting of three sessions of anodal, cathodal, or sham ctDCS. Before and after each intervention, motor symptom severity and inhibitory circuits of the sensorimotor network were investigated using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), including short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI), short-latency afferent inhibition (SAI) and CBI. Baseline TMS measurements showed inhibitory influence of SICI (p < 0.001) and SAI (p < 0.001) in CD patients, whereas CBI had no inhibitory effect (p = 0.281). The different ctDCS interventions caused no significant modulation in any of the inhibitory TMS paradigms investigated. Similarly, motor symptom severity remained unchanged after the ctDCS interventions. A single session of ctDCS was not effective to modulate inhibitory circuits of the sensorimotor network in isolated CD patients. Future studies focusing on repetitive ctDCS interventions or multifocal stimulation protocols are needed to assess the influence on network excitability and connectivity as well as on motor symptoms.

The CerebellumVol. 25(3)
Universität Hamburg (DE), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.