The Cordon Dilemma: How Voters Evaluate Cooperation With the Far-Right in Parliament

The electoral success of far-right parties forces mainstream parties to reconsider their strategies towards these challengers. Center-right parties in particular face trade-offs between a principled commitment to non-cooperation and their vote and policy goals. Accommodation may win back conservative voters, yet simultaneously alienate centrist supporters. Existing research has explored accommodation and dismissal primarily in the electoral arena, but less is known about the role of wholesale exclusion – the cordon sanitaire – in the legislative arena. Studying Germany, we examine how voters evaluate the willingness of the center-right (CDU/CSU) to collaborate with the far-right (AfD) in parliament. We show that voters overwhelmingly reject a coalition, while many are willing to tolerate issue-specific cooperation under certain conditions. By uncovering how voters balance principled commitments against instrumental policy goals, this study deepens our understanding of the electoral and democratic consequences of the cordon sanitaire.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Comparative Political Studies
Published
2026-05-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00104140261448429
Primary Topic
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Cordon Dilemma: How Voters Evaluate Cooperation With the Far-Right in Parliament

Christina‐Marie Juen, Christian Stecker, Martin Groß
Comparative Political Studies
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
article

The Cordon Dilemma: How Voters Evaluate Cooperation With the Far-Right in Parliament

Christina‐Marie Juen, Christian Stecker, Martin Groß
article en

Abstract

The electoral success of far-right parties forces mainstream parties to reconsider their strategies towards these challengers. Center-right parties in particular face trade-offs between a principled commitment to non-cooperation and their vote and policy goals. Accommodation may win back conservative voters, yet simultaneously alienate centrist supporters. Existing research has explored accommodation and dismissal primarily in the electoral arena, but less is known about the role of wholesale exclusion – the cordon sanitaire – in the legislative arena. Studying Germany, we examine how voters evaluate the willingness of the center-right (CDU/CSU) to collaborate with the far-right (AfD) in parliament. We show that voters overwhelmingly reject a coalition, while many are willing to tolerate issue-specific cooperation under certain conditions. By uncovering how voters balance principled commitments against instrumental policy goals, this study deepens our understanding of the electoral and democratic consequences of the cordon sanitaire.

Comparative Political Studies
Technische Universität Darmstadt (DE), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.