Sample Size Determination for Pilot Studies Based on Event Thresholds: A Framework for Evaluating Feasibility of Research Processes

Background: Pilot studies are essential for assessing feasibility and operational processes before large-scale research. This study presents a Poisson-based framework for determining the minimum pilot sample size based on discrete event thresholds. Methods: The number of events represents occurrences such as errors, deviations, or missing data that indicate whether a process is functioning as intended. Setting a maximum tolerable threshold for these events provides a clear decision rule for proceeding or refining study procedures. A Poisson-based model was applied for sample size calculation. Results: Based on α ≤ 0.05, the findings show that sample sizes vary depending on the study conditions, namely the maximum tolerable threshold and event rate. Sample size increases with the number of thresholds, while other parameters remain fixed. When α ≤ 0.05, sample sizes ranging from 12 to 26 are generally sufficient for studies involving three to five maximum tolerable thresholds, assuming an event rate of 10.0%. Larger sample sizes may be necessary when a greater number of thresholds are involved or when the acceptable event rate is low. Conclusions: The framework of sample size determination facilitates the early identification of potential issues and supports informed decision-making prior to conducting a full-scale study. In general, a sample size of 25 to 30 units is considered adequate for a pilot study, consistent with existing literature. However, larger sample sizes may be necessary when a greater number of thresholds are involved or when the acceptable event rate is low.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine
Published
2026-05-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/02537176261447652
Primary Topic
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sample Size Determination for Pilot Studies Based on Event Thresholds: A Framework for Evaluating Feasibility of Research Processes

Mohamad Adam Bujang
Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
article

Sample Size Determination for Pilot Studies Based on Event Thresholds: A Framework for Evaluating Feasibility of Research Processes

Mohamad Adam Bujang
article en

Abstract

Background: Pilot studies are essential for assessing feasibility and operational processes before large-scale research. This study presents a Poisson-based framework for determining the minimum pilot sample size based on discrete event thresholds. Methods: The number of events represents occurrences such as errors, deviations, or missing data that indicate whether a process is functioning as intended. Setting a maximum tolerable threshold for these events provides a clear decision rule for proceeding or refining study procedures. A Poisson-based model was applied for sample size calculation. Results: Based on α ≤ 0.05, the findings show that sample sizes vary depending on the study conditions, namely the maximum tolerable threshold and event rate. Sample size increases with the number of thresholds, while other parameters remain fixed. When α ≤ 0.05, sample sizes ranging from 12 to 26 are generally sufficient for studies involving three to five maximum tolerable thresholds, assuming an event rate of 10.0%. Larger sample sizes may be necessary when a greater number of thresholds are involved or when the acceptable event rate is low. Conclusions: The framework of sample size determination facilitates the early identification of potential issues and supports informed decision-making prior to conducting a full-scale study. In general, a sample size of 25 to 30 units is considered adequate for a pilot study, consistent with existing literature. However, larger sample sizes may be necessary when a greater number of thresholds are involved or when the acceptable event rate is low.

Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine
Sarawak General Hospital (MY)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.