Constructs, Predictive Factors and Measures: Insights From the Mental Health in the Moment (MHIM) Co‐Production Panel

ABSTRACT Introduction There is growing recognition of the methodological benefits of co‐producing adolescent mental health research. Co‐production supports the development of study methodologies that are more relevant and appropriate for the examination of adolescents' mental health. Within this article, insights from the Mental Health in the Moment Young Person Advisory Group (MHIM‐YPAG) are presented in relation to which mental health constructs, predictive factors and measures were endorsed by young people for inclusion in a mental health study. The aim of this paper is to provide guidance to researchers, highlight the benefits of co‐production and provide a template for co‐production in mental health study measures. Methods Members ( n = 18) took part in online ‘focus group style’ sessions covering constructs, predictive factors and measures related to adolescent mental health. They were asked to discuss and then individually rank a set of constructs, predictive factors and measures from most to least relevant. Following this, a semantic thematic analysis of session materials was performed by researchers and findings were verified by MHIM‐YPAG members. Results Members emphasised the importance of general and specific constructs that reflected both positive and negative traits. In addition, they emphasised the importance of examining suicidality/suicide‐ideation. Social media, academic stress and relationships were the most relevant predictive factors for this group. Language use and response scale length were important when deciding measures appropriateness. Conclusion This paper highlights the importance of involving young people as co‐producers within adolescent mental health research. Benefits include improving the appropriateness and relevance of the study design. Insights may act as a guide for researchers involved in adolescent mental health research. Patient and Public Contribution The ‘MHIM‐YPAG’ was established to enable the involvement of young people to co‐produce the MHIM project. Thus, this paper details the insights made by the MHIM‐YPAG regarding the inclusion of specific mental health constructs, predictive factors and measures. As detailed in the MHIM‐YPAG protocol paper, young people will be involved through the 5‐year project in a co‐production capacity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Expectations
Published
2026-05-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.70686
Primary Topic
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Constructs, Predictive Factors and Measures: Insights From the Mental Health in the Moment (MHIM) Co‐Production Panel

Paige Sinclair, Tong Xie, Luke Power, Dejla Hoxha et al.
Health Expectations
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
article

Constructs, Predictive Factors and Measures: Insights From the Mental Health in the Moment (MHIM) Co‐Production Panel

Paige Sinclair, Tong Xie, Luke Power, Dejla Hoxha, Lorna Caddick, Eva Drummond, Daria Melashenko, Katie Dryburgh, Aja Murray, Alex Crocker, Hannah Coulstock, Rowan Kelly, Poppy Fairbairn, Heather Bryson, Dacian Astilean‐Style, Sharon Ehimen, Yu‐Wen Tan
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction There is growing recognition of the methodological benefits of co‐producing adolescent mental health research. Co‐production supports the development of study methodologies that are more relevant and appropriate for the examination of adolescents' mental health. Within this article, insights from the Mental Health in the Moment Young Person Advisory Group (MHIM‐YPAG) are presented in relation to which mental health constructs, predictive factors and measures were endorsed by young people for inclusion in a mental health study. The aim of this paper is to provide guidance to researchers, highlight the benefits of co‐production and provide a template for co‐production in mental health study measures. Methods Members ( n = 18) took part in online ‘focus group style’ sessions covering constructs, predictive factors and measures related to adolescent mental health. They were asked to discuss and then individually rank a set of constructs, predictive factors and measures from most to least relevant. Following this, a semantic thematic analysis of session materials was performed by researchers and findings were verified by MHIM‐YPAG members. Results Members emphasised the importance of general and specific constructs that reflected both positive and negative traits. In addition, they emphasised the importance of examining suicidality/suicide‐ideation. Social media, academic stress and relationships were the most relevant predictive factors for this group. Language use and response scale length were important when deciding measures appropriateness. Conclusion This paper highlights the importance of involving young people as co‐producers within adolescent mental health research. Benefits include improving the appropriateness and relevance of the study design. Insights may act as a guide for researchers involved in adolescent mental health research. Patient and Public Contribution The ‘MHIM‐YPAG’ was established to enable the involvement of young people to co‐produce the MHIM project. Thus, this paper details the insights made by the MHIM‐YPAG regarding the inclusion of specific mental health constructs, predictive factors and measures. As detailed in the MHIM‐YPAG protocol paper, young people will be involved through the 5‐year project in a co‐production capacity.

Health ExpectationsVol. 29(3)
Beijing Normal University (CN), Language Science (South Korea) (KR), Pro Persona (NL), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Wellcome
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.