Mixed (reusable/single-use) catheter management versus single-use catheter management for intermittent catheter users (MultICath): A non-inferiority randomised controlled trial

PURPOSE: To determine if reuse of intermittent catheters is safe for the community management of long-term bladder emptying problems, this trial compared using a combination of reusable and single-use catheters (Mixed-use), to standard practice of single-use catheters only and examined the incidence of urinary tract infections (UTI). DESIGN: Open label, randomised, non-inferiority trial. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Community-dwelling intermittent catheter users aged over 18 were invited to join the Trial by 234 general practices and five community nursing teams across the United Kingdom. The Trial was managed from two university-based trial centres (Southampton and Glasgow) from April 2021 to July 2024. INTERVENTIONS: Random assignment (1:1) using permuted block sequences via a web-based system to receive either Mixed-use (trial reusable catheters plus participants' own single-use catheters) or Single-use (participants' own single-use catheters) for 12 months. Treatment allocation was masked from microbiology assessors but not participants or researchers. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was at least one episode of microbiologically confirmed symptomatic UTI (any sign or symptom) with help-seeking or self-help over 12 months. The critical odds ratio for non-inferiority was 2·0. The primary analysis was on a per protocol basis. Secondary outcomes included antibiotic-use, quality of life and participant reported problems with catheterisation. RESULTS: 578 participants were randomly assigned to Mixed-use (n = 289) or Single-use (n = 289). The per protocol analysis comprised 171 participants in Mixed-use and 244 participants in Single-use. The primary outcome of at least one UTI episode over 12 months was met by 49 (28·7%) of 171 participants in Mixed-use and 84 (34·4%) of 244 participants in Single-use. Mixed-use was non-inferior to Single-use (unadjusted odds ratio (95% CI): 0·77 (0·50, 1·17)). Antibiotic use was 35% less in Mixed-use compared to Single-use (adjusted incidence rate ratio (95% CI): 0·65 (0·45, 0·95)). Catheter 'sticking' was significantly worse in Mixed-use compared to Single-use. Participants reused a median of 2·8 (interquartile range: 1·8, 3·9) times per day. Quality of life and adverse events were similar across both groups. CONCLUSIONS: For the community management of long-term bladder emptying problems, the combined use of reusable and single-use catheters is as safe as using only single-use catheters for UTI and is associated with lower antibiotic use. Reusable catheters can be offered as a safe choice for intermittent catheter users. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN 42028483, 05.09.2019. Trial commenced 19.02.2021.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Nursing Studies
Published
2026-05-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2026.105536
Primary Topic
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mixed (reusable/single-use) catheter management versus single-use catheter management for intermittent catheter users (MultICath): A non-inferiority randomised controlled trial

Brian S Buckley, Rajvinder Khasriya, Gillian Watson, Sylvia Dickson et al.
International Journal of Nursing Studies
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
article

Mixed (reusable/single-use) catheter management versus single-use catheter management for intermittent catheter users (MultICath): A non-inferiority randomised controlled trial

Brian S Buckley, Rajvinder Khasriya, Gillian Watson, Sylvia Dickson, Miriam Avery, Doreen McClurg, Mandy Fader, Alaa Abouhajar, P. S. Little, Thomas Chadwick, Bridget Clancy, Sandra Wilks, Jacqui Prieto, Jackie Broadbridge, Nicola Goudie, CP James, Tracey Sach, Ruth Wood, Sara McCloskey, Nina Wilson, Margaret Macaulay, Cathy Murphy, Suzanne Hagen, Alan Cottenden, Alex Lymouri, Karen Guerrero, Carole Dorling, Isabel Reading, Mike Moore, Carl R. May, Anthony Timoney
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine if reuse of intermittent catheters is safe for the community management of long-term bladder emptying problems, this trial compared using a combination of reusable and single-use catheters (Mixed-use), to standard practice of single-use catheters only and examined the incidence of urinary tract infections (UTI). DESIGN: Open label, randomised, non-inferiority trial. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Community-dwelling intermittent catheter users aged over 18 were invited to join the Trial by 234 general practices and five community nursing teams across the United Kingdom. The Trial was managed from two university-based trial centres (Southampton and Glasgow) from April 2021 to July 2024. INTERVENTIONS: Random assignment (1:1) using permuted block sequences via a web-based system to receive either Mixed-use (trial reusable catheters plus participants' own single-use catheters) or Single-use (participants' own single-use catheters) for 12 months. Treatment allocation was masked from microbiology assessors but not participants or researchers. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was at least one episode of microbiologically confirmed symptomatic UTI (any sign or symptom) with help-seeking or self-help over 12 months. The critical odds ratio for non-inferiority was 2·0. The primary analysis was on a per protocol basis. Secondary outcomes included antibiotic-use, quality of life and participant reported problems with catheterisation. RESULTS: 578 participants were randomly assigned to Mixed-use (n = 289) or Single-use (n = 289). The per protocol analysis comprised 171 participants in Mixed-use and 244 participants in Single-use. The primary outcome of at least one UTI episode over 12 months was met by 49 (28·7%) of 171 participants in Mixed-use and 84 (34·4%) of 244 participants in Single-use. Mixed-use was non-inferior to Single-use (unadjusted odds ratio (95% CI): 0·77 (0·50, 1·17)). Antibiotic use was 35% less in Mixed-use compared to Single-use (adjusted incidence rate ratio (95% CI): 0·65 (0·45, 0·95)). Catheter 'sticking' was significantly worse in Mixed-use compared to Single-use. Participants reused a median of 2·8 (interquartile range: 1·8, 3·9) times per day. Quality of life and adverse events were similar across both groups. CONCLUSIONS: For the community management of long-term bladder emptying problems, the combined use of reusable and single-use catheters is as safe as using only single-use catheters for UTI and is associated with lower antibiotic use. Reusable catheters can be offered as a safe choice for intermittent catheter users. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN 42028483, 05.09.2019. Trial commenced 19.02.2021.

International Journal of Nursing StudiesVol. 180
University of London (GB), University of West London (GB), Glasgow Caledonian University (GB), Southmead Hospital (GB), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB), Queen Elizabeth University Hospital (GB), University of Southampton (GB), University College London (GB), Newcastle University (GB), University of the Philippines Diliman (PH)
National Institute for Health and Care Research, Programme Grants for Applied Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.