Testing a Connected-Singularity Mechanism for Gravitational Feedback Cosmology

Within the feedback-attractor framework of Paper I (Salmond 2026, The Cosmological Constant as a Feedback Attractor; hereafter Paper I), which proves that any cosmology with negative feedback between Λ and structure formation has a unique stable fixed point, we propose the Connected Singularity Hypothesis (CSH): a cyclic cosmology in which black-hole (BH) interior boundaries are topologically identified with the Big Bang boundary. The CSH admits two physically distinct readings — live identification (Reading A: Λ_eff sourced in real time by accumulating BH mass) and cycle-boundary identification (Reading B: Λ fixed at the Big Bang by the previous cycle). Reading A makes a sharp, parameter-free structural prediction: ρ_DE(z)/ρ_DE,0 ≤ 1 for all z ≥ 0, with local equation of state w_eff(z=0) = −1.09 ± 0.04 (phantom, derived from the Madau & Dickinson cosmic star formation rate (SFR) with zero free parameters). The framework was developed after the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) DR2's April 2025 public release; Reading A's structural ceiling lies in the half-plane opposite to DESI's preferred ρ_DE(z=1)/ρ_DE,0 ≈ 1.21, confirming it could not have been constructed to accommodate the data. A joint baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) + cosmic microwave background (CMB) analysis disfavours Reading A at 4.5σ — the prediction was falsifiable, was tested, and the falsification is informative: it constrains the BH–Big Bang boundary identification to operate atemporally at cycle boundaries, not as a live source within a cosmic cycle. The framework is therefore developed under Reading B (w_eff = −1 exactly, ΛCDM background to leading order). Three signatures distinguish the resulting framework from standard ΛCDM: (F3) a σ₈–Λ joint constraint d ln Λ/d ln σ₈ ≈ −1.4, partially tested by Dark Energy Survey (DES) Y6 (S₈ = 0.789 ± 0.012, 1.8σ below CMB) and approaching the decisive DESI-DR2 × DES-Y6 test; (C3) population-level uniformity in LIGO–Virgo–KAGRA (LVK) BH parameters beyond population-synthesis predictions, testable now with the Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog (GWTC-4); and (C4) a Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (LISA) primordial gravitational-wave (GW) spectral feature at f* ∈ [10⁻⁵, 10⁻³] Hz (target: LISA Y1, ~2035–2037). F3 and C3 carry structural caveats: F3's Press–Schechter slope (−1.4) is degenerate with the ΛCDM data-projection slope (~−1.3) from the S₈ weak-lensing degeneracy; C3's population-level signal reduces to a cumulative-mass anchor that is degenerate with current astrophysical extrapolation uncertainty (~2 dex) at GWTC-4 sensitivity. Both are retained as registered predictions deferred to power-adequate tests; C4 remains the framework's distinctive forward-looking empirical content. The framework of Paper I survives regardless of the CSH's fate.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-05-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20222174
Primary Topic
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Testing a Connected-Singularity Mechanism for Gravitational Feedback Cosmology

Peter Salmond
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
preprint

Testing a Connected-Singularity Mechanism for Gravitational Feedback Cosmology

Peter Salmond
preprint en

Abstract

Within the feedback-attractor framework of Paper I (Salmond 2026, The Cosmological Constant as a Feedback Attractor; hereafter Paper I), which proves that any cosmology with negative feedback between Λ and structure formation has a unique stable fixed point, we propose the Connected Singularity Hypothesis (CSH): a cyclic cosmology in which black-hole (BH) interior boundaries are topologically identified with the Big Bang boundary. The CSH admits two physically distinct readings — live identification (Reading A: Λ_eff sourced in real time by accumulating BH mass) and cycle-boundary identification (Reading B: Λ fixed at the Big Bang by the previous cycle). Reading A makes a sharp, parameter-free structural prediction: ρ_DE(z)/ρ_DE,0 ≤ 1 for all z ≥ 0, with local equation of state w_eff(z=0) = −1.09 ± 0.04 (phantom, derived from the Madau & Dickinson cosmic star formation rate (SFR) with zero free parameters). The framework was developed after the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) DR2's April 2025 public release; Reading A's structural ceiling lies in the half-plane opposite to DESI's preferred ρ_DE(z=1)/ρ_DE,0 ≈ 1.21, confirming it could not have been constructed to accommodate the data. A joint baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) + cosmic microwave background (CMB) analysis disfavours Reading A at 4.5σ — the prediction was falsifiable, was tested, and the falsification is informative: it constrains the BH–Big Bang boundary identification to operate atemporally at cycle boundaries, not as a live source within a cosmic cycle. The framework is therefore developed under Reading B (w_eff = −1 exactly, ΛCDM background to leading order). Three signatures distinguish the resulting framework from standard ΛCDM: (F3) a σ₈–Λ joint constraint d ln Λ/d ln σ₈ ≈ −1.4, partially tested by Dark Energy Survey (DES) Y6 (S₈ = 0.789 ± 0.012, 1.8σ below CMB) and approaching the decisive DESI-DR2 × DES-Y6 test; (C3) population-level uniformity in LIGO–Virgo–KAGRA (LVK) BH parameters beyond population-synthesis predictions, testable now with the Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog (GWTC-4); and (C4) a Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (LISA) primordial gravitational-wave (GW) spectral feature at f* ∈ [10⁻⁵, 10⁻³] Hz (target: LISA Y1, ~2035–2037). F3 and C3 carry structural caveats: F3's Press–Schechter slope (−1.4) is degenerate with the ΛCDM data-projection slope (~−1.3) from the S₈ weak-lensing degeneracy; C3's population-level signal reduces to a cumulative-mass anchor that is degenerate with current astrophysical extrapolation uncertainty (~2 dex) at GWTC-4 sensitivity. Both are retained as registered predictions deferred to power-adequate tests; C4 remains the framework's distinctive forward-looking empirical content. The framework of Paper I survives regardless of the CSH's fate.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Quality Education
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.