Randomized controlled trial investigating the efficacy of oral azithromycin in preventing perinatal infections in pregnant women undergoing labor induction

Abstract Objectives This study evaluates oral azithromycin's effectiveness in reducing intrapartum and puerperal infection rates in term pregnant women undergoing labor induction to guide antibiotic prophylaxis. Methods This single‐center randomized controlled trial enrolled 472 women with term singleton pregnancies undergoing labor induction. The participants were randomly allocated to receive either 2 g of oral azithromycin ( n = 236) or no treatment ( n = 236). The primary outcome was the overall perinatal infection rate (which includes both intrapartum and/or puerperal infections). Secondary outcomes included maternal and neonatal complications, mode of delivery, and safety parameters. Results analysis adopted an intention‐to‐treat approach. Results The overall perinatal infection rate did not differ significantly between the azithromycin group (16.1%) and the control group (16.9%) (absolute risk difference [ARD] = −0.85%, relative risk [RR] = 0.950, 95% confidence interval 0.633–1.425; P = 0.804). Similarly, the incidence of neonatal infectious diseases showed no significant difference between the two groups (2.5% vs 5.1%, P = 0.149). Both groups had comparable outcomes in mode of delivery, maternal–neonatal complications (epidural analgesia, postpartum hemorrhage, and pre‐ and post‐delivery antibiotic use), total labor duration, neonatal hypoglycemia, neonatal intensive care unit admission, and neonatal antibiotic administration. Maternal outcomes did not differ significantly between groups, although 3.4% (8/236) of women in the azithromycin group reported gastrointestinal symptoms during labor, with a total adverse event rate of 3.8% (9/236, including one case of dizziness). Conclusion The use of an additional 2 g azithromycin provides no additional benefit in reducing the overall risk of maternal infection and perinatal infection in an already intensive antibiotic prophylactic and well‐resourced setting. Clinical Trial Registration This study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, registration number ChiCTR2300077629, November 14, 2023 ( https://www.chictr.org.cn/showprojEN.html ).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
Published
2026-05-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.71083
Primary Topic
Preterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Randomized controlled trial investigating the efficacy of oral azithromycin in preventing perinatal infections in pregnant women undergoing labor induction

Huimin Cao, Ning Gu, Ling Yang, Yan Zhou et al.
International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
Preterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis
article

Randomized controlled trial investigating the efficacy of oral azithromycin in preventing perinatal infections in pregnant women undergoing labor induction

Huimin Cao, Ning Gu, Ling Yang, Yan Zhou, Yimin Dai
article en

Abstract

Abstract Objectives This study evaluates oral azithromycin's effectiveness in reducing intrapartum and puerperal infection rates in term pregnant women undergoing labor induction to guide antibiotic prophylaxis. Methods This single‐center randomized controlled trial enrolled 472 women with term singleton pregnancies undergoing labor induction. The participants were randomly allocated to receive either 2 g of oral azithromycin ( n = 236) or no treatment ( n = 236). The primary outcome was the overall perinatal infection rate (which includes both intrapartum and/or puerperal infections). Secondary outcomes included maternal and neonatal complications, mode of delivery, and safety parameters. Results analysis adopted an intention‐to‐treat approach. Results The overall perinatal infection rate did not differ significantly between the azithromycin group (16.1%) and the control group (16.9%) (absolute risk difference [ARD] = −0.85%, relative risk [RR] = 0.950, 95% confidence interval 0.633–1.425; P = 0.804). Similarly, the incidence of neonatal infectious diseases showed no significant difference between the two groups (2.5% vs 5.1%, P = 0.149). Both groups had comparable outcomes in mode of delivery, maternal–neonatal complications (epidural analgesia, postpartum hemorrhage, and pre‐ and post‐delivery antibiotic use), total labor duration, neonatal hypoglycemia, neonatal intensive care unit admission, and neonatal antibiotic administration. Maternal outcomes did not differ significantly between groups, although 3.4% (8/236) of women in the azithromycin group reported gastrointestinal symptoms during labor, with a total adverse event rate of 3.8% (9/236, including one case of dizziness). Conclusion The use of an additional 2 g azithromycin provides no additional benefit in reducing the overall risk of maternal infection and perinatal infection in an already intensive antibiotic prophylactic and well‐resourced setting. Clinical Trial Registration This study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, registration number ChiCTR2300077629, November 14, 2023 ( https://www.chictr.org.cn/showprojEN.html ).

International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
Tongren Hospital (CN), Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Preterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.