High Risk for Rare Autosomal Trisomies Detected by Non‐Invasive Prenatal Testing: Prenatal Diagnosis and Pregnancy Outcomes

ABSTRACT Objective To investigate the incidence, positive predictive value (PPV) and pregnancy outcomes of rare autosomal trisomies (RATs) identified by non‐invasive prenatal testing (NIPT). Method A retrospective analysis of pregnancies who underwent NIPT at our center between May 2020 and August 2024 and received high‐risk RATs results. A copy number (CN) ≥ 2.4 indicated high‐risk for maternal duplications, while a CN ≤ 1.6 correlated with maternal deletion. Targeted amplicon sequencing was utilized to screen for uniparental disomy (UPD)‐related imprinting disorders. Prenatal diagnosis and pregnancy outcome follow‐up were recommended for all high‐risk pregnancies. Results Among 20,796 pregnancies screened, 0.26% (55/20,796) were identified as high‐risk for RATs. Prenatal diagnosis was performed in 44 cases, with a PPV of 4.55%. Maternal copy number variations were confirmed in four cases, three of which were transmitted to the fetus. No UPD‐related imprinting disorders were detected in the 23 cases. Two cases of mosaic trisomy showed similar levels of mosaicism on chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) but had divergent clinical outcomes. Among 36 cases with no abnormalities detected by prenatal CMA, 38.89% had adverse outcomes. Conclusion NIPT for RATs has a low PPV, but the risk of adverse outcomes is high. Mosaic RATs identified via amniocyte‐based prenatal diagnosis do not always correlate with an obvious postnatal phenotype. Integrating prenatal diagnosis with ultrasound monitoring is essential for fetal prognosis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Prenatal Diagnosis
Published
2026-05-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.70181
Primary Topic
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

High Risk for Rare Autosomal Trisomies Detected by Non‐Invasive Prenatal Testing: Prenatal Diagnosis and Pregnancy Outcomes

段红蕾, W Y Liu, Zhu X, Yujie Zhu et al.
Prenatal Diagnosis
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
article

High Risk for Rare Autosomal Trisomies Detected by Non‐Invasive Prenatal Testing: Prenatal Diagnosis and Pregnancy Outcomes

段红蕾, W Y Liu, Zhu X, Yujie Zhu, Qiqi Xu, Ying Zhang, Leilei Gu, Jie Li, Wanjun Wang, Zihan Jiang
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective To investigate the incidence, positive predictive value (PPV) and pregnancy outcomes of rare autosomal trisomies (RATs) identified by non‐invasive prenatal testing (NIPT). Method A retrospective analysis of pregnancies who underwent NIPT at our center between May 2020 and August 2024 and received high‐risk RATs results. A copy number (CN) ≥ 2.4 indicated high‐risk for maternal duplications, while a CN ≤ 1.6 correlated with maternal deletion. Targeted amplicon sequencing was utilized to screen for uniparental disomy (UPD)‐related imprinting disorders. Prenatal diagnosis and pregnancy outcome follow‐up were recommended for all high‐risk pregnancies. Results Among 20,796 pregnancies screened, 0.26% (55/20,796) were identified as high‐risk for RATs. Prenatal diagnosis was performed in 44 cases, with a PPV of 4.55%. Maternal copy number variations were confirmed in four cases, three of which were transmitted to the fetus. No UPD‐related imprinting disorders were detected in the 23 cases. Two cases of mosaic trisomy showed similar levels of mosaicism on chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) but had divergent clinical outcomes. Among 36 cases with no abnormalities detected by prenatal CMA, 38.89% had adverse outcomes. Conclusion NIPT for RATs has a low PPV, but the risk of adverse outcomes is high. Mosaic RATs identified via amniocyte‐based prenatal diagnosis do not always correlate with an obvious postnatal phenotype. Integrating prenatal diagnosis with ultrasound monitoring is essential for fetal prognosis.

Prenatal Diagnosis
Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK), Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.