Potentialities and Limitations of Cross-National Problem-Solving Discussion using Technology

Abstract Problem solving in mathematics requires students to apply mathematical competencies, including effectively communicating their reasoning. Here, we consider the use of technologies in mathematics education to promote cross-national collaboration between students in discussions triggered by problem-solving activities. We focus on a novel form of mathematical discussion facilitated by the online platform Padlet. This discussion begins in Padlet, where students propose their solutions to a mathematics problem using posts that might incorporate various communication registers. In our experiment, this platform facilitated collaboration between classes from different countries, as paired classes from Argentina, Canada, and Italy exchanged their Padlets with each other. This promoted collaborative efforts between students from different countries. Thus, Padlet became a medium for multilevel classroom discussions. In this snapshot, our aim is to consider the perspective of the teachers involved in this collaboration. Thus, we conducted a SWOT analysis based on teachers’ voices to highlight the potentialities and limitations of promoting such international mathematical collaboration and discussion. This prompted the formulation of new strategies to enhance the achievement of such transnational mathematical discussion.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education
Published
2026-05-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40751-026-00198-z
Primary Topic
Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Potentialities and Limitations of Cross-National Problem-Solving Discussion using Technology

Chiara Giberti, Silvia Beltramino, Alice Lemmo, David Wagner et al.
Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education
Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
article

Potentialities and Limitations of Cross-National Problem-Solving Discussion using Technology

Chiara Giberti, Silvia Beltramino, Alice Lemmo, David Wagner, Mónica E. Villarreal, Eugenia Taranto, Sara Bagossi, Paolo Cazzaniga, Veronica Marchesini, Cody Alderson, Kate Whitters
article en

Abstract

Abstract Problem solving in mathematics requires students to apply mathematical competencies, including effectively communicating their reasoning. Here, we consider the use of technologies in mathematics education to promote cross-national collaboration between students in discussions triggered by problem-solving activities. We focus on a novel form of mathematical discussion facilitated by the online platform Padlet. This discussion begins in Padlet, where students propose their solutions to a mathematics problem using posts that might incorporate various communication registers. In our experiment, this platform facilitated collaboration between classes from different countries, as paired classes from Argentina, Canada, and Italy exchanged their Padlets with each other. This promoted collaborative efforts between students from different countries. Thus, Padlet became a medium for multilevel classroom discussions. In this snapshot, our aim is to consider the perspective of the teachers involved in this collaboration. Thus, we conducted a SWOT analysis based on teachers’ voices to highlight the potentialities and limitations of promoting such international mathematical collaboration and discussion. This prompted the formulation of new strategies to enhance the achievement of such transnational mathematical discussion.

Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education
University of New Brunswick (CA), University of Bergamo (IT), University of Modena and Reggio Emilia (IT), Universidad Nacional de Córdoba (AR), Free University of Bozen-Bolzano (IT), Università degli Studi di Enna Kore (IT), University of L'Aquila (IT), Centro Científico Tecnológico - Córdoba (AR), I.R.C.C.S. Oasi Maria SS (IT), Roth and Rau (Germany) (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.