Referral patterns and requested interventions in a cancer pain e-consult system

Chronic pain affects a substantial proportion of patients with cancer and remains undertreated despite advances in pharmacologic and interventional management. Electronic consultation (e-consult) systems have improved specialty access in other fields, yet their application to interventional cancer pain has not been described. To characterize the referral patterns and requested interventions of a dedicated interventional cancer pain e-consult platform at a large academic medical center. We conducted a single-center retrospective study of interventional cancer pain e-consults placed through the electronic health record at Massachusetts General Hospital between January 1, 2020, and December 30, 2024. Consult orders were identified via structured EHR query and underwent manual chart review. Abstracted variables included demographics, referring specialty, intervention category, mortality status, and days from referral to death. Associations between intervention category and sex or mortality were evaluated using chi-square and Fisher's exact tests. A total of 348 e-consults were included. Mean age at referral was 62 years (SD 15); sex distribution was near equal (49% male). At the time of review, 53% of patients were deceased, with a median interval from referral to death of 148 days (IQR 62–282). The most frequently requested interventions were celiac axis block (24%), spine-related procedures (16%), and opioid management (14%). Hospice and palliative medicine accounted for 53% of referrals, followed by gastrointestinal oncology (12%). Vital status at data extraction differed significantly by intervention category (p = 0.049), with celiac axis block associated with higher odds of deceased status (OR 1.76, p = 0.03) and intercostal nerve block associated with lower odds (OR 0.29, p = 0.04). A dedicated interventional cancer pain e-consult system attracted referrals spanning 19 procedural categories and multiple oncologic and palliative specialties, including a substantial proportion of patients near end of life. These findings suggest that e-consults represent a scalable, low-friction mechanism to broaden access to interventional pain expertise across the cancer care continuum.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Interventional Pain Medicine
Published
2026-05-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inpm.2026.100772
Primary Topic
Healthcare Systems and Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Referral patterns and requested interventions in a cancer pain e-consult system

Matthew R. Smith, Sarah Ahmed, David Hao, Vicki Jackson et al.
Interventional Pain Medicine
Healthcare Systems and Technology
article

Referral patterns and requested interventions in a cancer pain e-consult system

Matthew R. Smith, Sarah Ahmed, David Hao, Vicki Jackson, Moustafa Abdalla
article en

Abstract

Chronic pain affects a substantial proportion of patients with cancer and remains undertreated despite advances in pharmacologic and interventional management. Electronic consultation (e-consult) systems have improved specialty access in other fields, yet their application to interventional cancer pain has not been described. To characterize the referral patterns and requested interventions of a dedicated interventional cancer pain e-consult platform at a large academic medical center. We conducted a single-center retrospective study of interventional cancer pain e-consults placed through the electronic health record at Massachusetts General Hospital between January 1, 2020, and December 30, 2024. Consult orders were identified via structured EHR query and underwent manual chart review. Abstracted variables included demographics, referring specialty, intervention category, mortality status, and days from referral to death. Associations between intervention category and sex or mortality were evaluated using chi-square and Fisher's exact tests. A total of 348 e-consults were included. Mean age at referral was 62 years (SD 15); sex distribution was near equal (49% male). At the time of review, 53% of patients were deceased, with a median interval from referral to death of 148 days (IQR 62–282). The most frequently requested interventions were celiac axis block (24%), spine-related procedures (16%), and opioid management (14%). Hospice and palliative medicine accounted for 53% of referrals, followed by gastrointestinal oncology (12%). Vital status at data extraction differed significantly by intervention category (p = 0.049), with celiac axis block associated with higher odds of deceased status (OR 1.76, p = 0.03) and intercostal nerve block associated with lower odds (OR 0.29, p = 0.04). A dedicated interventional cancer pain e-consult system attracted referrals spanning 19 procedural categories and multiple oncologic and palliative specialties, including a substantial proportion of patients near end of life. These findings suggest that e-consults represent a scalable, low-friction mechanism to broaden access to interventional pain expertise across the cancer care continuum.

Interventional Pain MedicineVol. 5(2)
Boston University (US), Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Healthcare Systems and Technology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.