Reshaping immunotherapy sequencing strategy: equivalent survival with induction plus consolidation vs. consolidation-only strategy in unresectable stage III NSCLC

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of a sequential combination of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) administered as induction plus consolidation versus consolidation-only in patients with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: = 112). Propensity score matching (PSM, 1:1 ratio) was used to balance baseline characteristics. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank tests. Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated according to CTCAE v5.0. RESULTS: = 0.004). CONCLUSION: In treatment-tolerant patients, induction plus consolidation therapy demonstrated comparable efficacy and safety to consolidation-only therapy in unresectable stage III NSCLC.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
OncoImmunology
Published
2026-05-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/2162402x.2026.2670221
Primary Topic
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reshaping immunotherapy sequencing strategy: equivalent survival with induction plus consolidation vs. consolidation-only strategy in unresectable stage III NSCLC

Shuangping Zhang, Liang Yu, N N Yao, Anqi Zhao et al.
OncoImmunology
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
article

Reshaping immunotherapy sequencing strategy: equivalent survival with induction plus consolidation vs. consolidation-only strategy in unresectable stage III NSCLC

Shuangping Zhang, Liang Yu, N N Yao, Anqi Zhao, Wenbo Zhang, Xin Cao, Jianchun Duan, Yuying Zhou, Feng Li, Nan Bi, Baixue Wu, Meng Zhao, Qing Hou, Jianzhong Cao, Wenlu Chen
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of a sequential combination of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) administered as induction plus consolidation versus consolidation-only in patients with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: = 112). Propensity score matching (PSM, 1:1 ratio) was used to balance baseline characteristics. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank tests. Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated according to CTCAE v5.0. RESULTS: = 0.004). CONCLUSION: In treatment-tolerant patients, induction plus consolidation therapy demonstrated comparable efficacy and safety to consolidation-only therapy in unresectable stage III NSCLC.

OncoImmunologyVol. 15(1)
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN), National Cancer Center (US), Shanxi Provincial Cancer Hospital (CN), National Clinical Research (US), Cancer Hospital of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Reshaping immunotherapy sequencing strategy: equivalent survival with induction plus consolidation vs. consolidation-only strategy in unresectable stage III NSCLC — Shuangping Zhang, Liang Yu, et al. · OncoImmunology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS