Heterogeneity in teachers' perceptions of inclusive education and their association with school‐level indicator fulfilment

Abstract This study examined heterogeneity in teachers' perceptions of inclusive education (IE) and their association with schools' fulfilment of IE indicators in Oman. Data were collected from 430 public‐school teachers using Arabic versions of the Sentiments, Attitudes and Concerns about Inclusive Education–Revised (SACIE‐R) and a localized Inclusive Education Fulfilment Scale derived from the Pacific‐INDIE framework. Confirmatory factor analyses supported the construct validity of both measures. Latent profile analysis identified three distinct teacher profiles: Reluctant but At‐Ease (32.1%), Committed but Conflicted (28.8%) and Open and Untroubled (39.1%). Educational stage significantly predicted one pairwise profile contrast, whereas teaching experience was not significant. Bolck–Croon–Hagenaars analyses revealed significant differences in institutional fulfilment across profiles, with the Reluctant but At‐Ease group reporting significantly higher fulfilment across all 10 domains of inclusive education fulfilment, as well as on the total fulfilment score, than the Committed but Conflicted and Open and Untroubled groups. No significant differences were found between the latter two profiles across any domain or on the total score. The findings underscore the complex relationship between teachers' psychological orientations and institutional capacity, highlighting the need to align inclusive policy reform with differentiated teacher support to sustain inclusive education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Educational Research Journal
Published
2026-05-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.70209
Primary Topic
Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Heterogeneity in teachers' perceptions of inclusive education and their association with school‐level indicator fulfilment

Mahmoud Emam
British Educational Research Journal
Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
article

Heterogeneity in teachers' perceptions of inclusive education and their association with school‐level indicator fulfilment

Mahmoud Emam
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study examined heterogeneity in teachers' perceptions of inclusive education (IE) and their association with schools' fulfilment of IE indicators in Oman. Data were collected from 430 public‐school teachers using Arabic versions of the Sentiments, Attitudes and Concerns about Inclusive Education–Revised (SACIE‐R) and a localized Inclusive Education Fulfilment Scale derived from the Pacific‐INDIE framework. Confirmatory factor analyses supported the construct validity of both measures. Latent profile analysis identified three distinct teacher profiles: Reluctant but At‐Ease (32.1%), Committed but Conflicted (28.8%) and Open and Untroubled (39.1%). Educational stage significantly predicted one pairwise profile contrast, whereas teaching experience was not significant. Bolck–Croon–Hagenaars analyses revealed significant differences in institutional fulfilment across profiles, with the Reluctant but At‐Ease group reporting significantly higher fulfilment across all 10 domains of inclusive education fulfilment, as well as on the total fulfilment score, than the Committed but Conflicted and Open and Untroubled groups. No significant differences were found between the latter two profiles across any domain or on the total score. The findings underscore the complex relationship between teachers' psychological orientations and institutional capacity, highlighting the need to align inclusive policy reform with differentiated teacher support to sustain inclusive education.

British Educational Research Journal
Sultan Qaboos University (OM)
Ministry of Higher Education, Research and Innovation
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.