Target detection enhances relational processing of background items: evidence from associative recognition paradigms and EEG

BACKGROUND: The Attentional Boost Effect (ABE) refers to the enhancement of memory for concurrently presented background information when target detection is performed during encoding. However, there is still controversy regarding whether ABE-related manipulations can both enhance item-specific and relational processing. Given that resolving this issue can enhance our understanding of the generality of the ABE, we will validate this issue and explore its underlying neural mechanisms. METHODS: The current study combined the ABE paradigm with the associative recognition paradigm and employed compound pairs and unrelated pairs as memory materials to manipulate the reliance on item-specific or relational information, using a 2 (detection stimulus type: target vs. distractor) × 2 (word pair: compound vs. unrelated) within-subject design. Furthermore, we conducted event-related potential (ERP) and time-frequency analyses (TFA) on participants' electrophysiological data during associative recognition to further explore the underlying neural mechanisms of the ABE. RESULTS: The results showed that, behaviorally, participants remembered more target-paired pairs than distractor-paired pairs for both types of word pairs, demonstrating an ABE. In the ERP results, target word pairs evoked a significant FN400 effect, related to familiarity, whereas distractor word pairs did not evoke this effect. Furthermore, for compound pairs, target pairs evoked larger LPC effects than distractor pairs, which were related to recollection; however, for unrelated pairs, there was no difference in the LPC effect between target and distractor pairs. The TFA results showed that target word pairs induced lower gamma-band activity than distractor word pairs, reflecting familiarity processing. CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, target detection enhanced associative memory performance, indicating that ABE-related manipulations can both facilitate item-specific and relational processing. At the neural mechanism level, ABE-related manipulations enhanced the contribution of familiarity in associative recognition, and when the semantic association between items was stronger, ABE-related manipulations further enhanced recollection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Psychology
Published
2026-05-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-026-04717-w
Primary Topic
Memory Processes and Influences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Target detection enhances relational processing of background items: evidence from associative recognition paradigms and EEG

Yingfang Meng, Peijie Chen, Zejun Liu
BMC Psychology
Memory Processes and Influences
article

Target detection enhances relational processing of background items: evidence from associative recognition paradigms and EEG

Yingfang Meng, Peijie Chen, Zejun Liu
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Attentional Boost Effect (ABE) refers to the enhancement of memory for concurrently presented background information when target detection is performed during encoding. However, there is still controversy regarding whether ABE-related manipulations can both enhance item-specific and relational processing. Given that resolving this issue can enhance our understanding of the generality of the ABE, we will validate this issue and explore its underlying neural mechanisms. METHODS: The current study combined the ABE paradigm with the associative recognition paradigm and employed compound pairs and unrelated pairs as memory materials to manipulate the reliance on item-specific or relational information, using a 2 (detection stimulus type: target vs. distractor) × 2 (word pair: compound vs. unrelated) within-subject design. Furthermore, we conducted event-related potential (ERP) and time-frequency analyses (TFA) on participants' electrophysiological data during associative recognition to further explore the underlying neural mechanisms of the ABE. RESULTS: The results showed that, behaviorally, participants remembered more target-paired pairs than distractor-paired pairs for both types of word pairs, demonstrating an ABE. In the ERP results, target word pairs evoked a significant FN400 effect, related to familiarity, whereas distractor word pairs did not evoke this effect. Furthermore, for compound pairs, target pairs evoked larger LPC effects than distractor pairs, which were related to recollection; however, for unrelated pairs, there was no difference in the LPC effect between target and distractor pairs. The TFA results showed that target word pairs induced lower gamma-band activity than distractor word pairs, reflecting familiarity processing. CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, target detection enhanced associative memory performance, indicating that ABE-related manipulations can both facilitate item-specific and relational processing. At the neural mechanism level, ABE-related manipulations enhanced the contribution of familiarity in associative recognition, and when the semantic association between items was stronger, ABE-related manipulations further enhanced recollection.

BMC Psychology
Fujian Normal University (CN), Shanghai Normal University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Memory Processes and Influences
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.