Barriers and Facilitators to Implementing Homelike Models in Long-Term Care: A Scoping Review Using the Updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research

Background Home-like models in long-term care (LTC) aim to improve residents’ well-being, autonomy, and daily life experience. However, its implementation is inconsistent with variation in adoption and sustainability across settings. Objective To systematically identify and explain the multilevel barriers and facilitators that shape implementation of home-like models in LTC. Methods A scoping review of 36 peer-reviewed studies and 13 Canadian grey literature documents was conducted. Implementation factors were extracted and mapped to the updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR 2022). Results Fifty-two implementation factors emerged (23 barriers, 29 facilitators). Inner Setting, including staffing instability, organizational culture, leadership, and resource availability, was the most influential but constrained by Outer Setting determinants (regulatory rigidity and funding). Among facilitators, adaptive leadership and staff engagement were most consistently identified, followed by supportive organizational culture and flexible regulatory approaches. Homes employing incremental or pilot-based strategies manage implementation complexity and sustain culture change over time.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Applied Gerontology
Published
2026-05-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/07334648261451907
Primary Topic
Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Barriers and Facilitators to Implementing Homelike Models in Long-Term Care: A Scoping Review Using the Updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research

Afshin Vafaei, Maxwell Smith, Denise Bedard, Marie Savundranayagam
Journal of Applied Gerontology
Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
article

Barriers and Facilitators to Implementing Homelike Models in Long-Term Care: A Scoping Review Using the Updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research

Afshin Vafaei, Maxwell Smith, Denise Bedard, Marie Savundranayagam
article en

Abstract

Background Home-like models in long-term care (LTC) aim to improve residents’ well-being, autonomy, and daily life experience. However, its implementation is inconsistent with variation in adoption and sustainability across settings. Objective To systematically identify and explain the multilevel barriers and facilitators that shape implementation of home-like models in LTC. Methods A scoping review of 36 peer-reviewed studies and 13 Canadian grey literature documents was conducted. Implementation factors were extracted and mapped to the updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR 2022). Results Fifty-two implementation factors emerged (23 barriers, 29 facilitators). Inner Setting, including staffing instability, organizational culture, leadership, and resource availability, was the most influential but constrained by Outer Setting determinants (regulatory rigidity and funding). Among facilitators, adaptive leadership and staff engagement were most consistently identified, followed by supportive organizational culture and flexible regulatory approaches. Homes employing incremental or pilot-based strategies manage implementation complexity and sustain culture change over time.

Journal of Applied Gerontology
Western University (CA)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.