Learning with AI: Student Intentions for Academic Use and Broader Perspectives on AI

Abstract The purpose of this mixed-methods study was to examine the factors predicting college students’ intention to use AI for academic tasks. Extending the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), four factors, including understanding AI features, AI for future careers, AI integration for learning, and ethical concerns about AI, were examined to determine whether those factors influence students’ intention to use AI in academic tasks. A total of 112 students majoring in strategic communication from a midwestern U.S. university participated in the study. The regression results showed that the more students perceived AI integration to enhance their learning and AI as an integral part of the future, the more likely they were to use AI tools for academic tasks. Conversely, the greater their ethical concerns about AI, the less likely they were to use AI tools for academic tasks. Additionally, interviews with ten students revealed their perspectives on using AI tools, including emerging and diminishing professional traits, as well as positive impacts and concerns in the field of strategic communication. This study extends TAM by identifying discipline-specific usefulness dimensions and ethical barriers that predict AI adoption in academic settings, offering guidance for educators designing AI integration strategies in higher education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Technology Knowledge and Learning
Published
2026-05-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-026-09982-7
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Learning with AI: Student Intentions for Academic Use and Broader Perspectives on AI

Hyeonho Yu, SeongMi Lim, EunHae Grace Park, Moon-Heum Cho
Technology Knowledge and Learning
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Learning with AI: Student Intentions for Academic Use and Broader Perspectives on AI

Hyeonho Yu, SeongMi Lim, EunHae Grace Park, Moon-Heum Cho
article en

Abstract

Abstract The purpose of this mixed-methods study was to examine the factors predicting college students’ intention to use AI for academic tasks. Extending the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), four factors, including understanding AI features, AI for future careers, AI integration for learning, and ethical concerns about AI, were examined to determine whether those factors influence students’ intention to use AI in academic tasks. A total of 112 students majoring in strategic communication from a midwestern U.S. university participated in the study. The regression results showed that the more students perceived AI integration to enhance their learning and AI as an integral part of the future, the more likely they were to use AI tools for academic tasks. Conversely, the greater their ethical concerns about AI, the less likely they were to use AI tools for academic tasks. Additionally, interviews with ten students revealed their perspectives on using AI tools, including emerging and diminishing professional traits, as well as positive impacts and concerns in the field of strategic communication. This study extends TAM by identifying discipline-specific usefulness dimensions and ethical barriers that predict AI adoption in academic settings, offering guidance for educators designing AI integration strategies in higher education.

Technology Knowledge and Learning
Ball State University (US), Syracuse University (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.