Models of palliative care for culturally and linguistically diverse people in high-income nations: A scoping review

Background: Access to palliative care remains uneven for people described, often variably and controversially, as culturally and linguistically diverse. Terminology and definitions differ across jurisdictions, shaping how models are designed, implemented, and reported. Evidence on model design and impact for people of culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds is limited and heterogeneous. Aim: To map what is known about palliative care models for adults of culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds in high-income nations, describing model components, reported outcomes, implementation influences, and gaps. Design: A scoping review was conducted, guided by the JBI manual and the PRISMA-ScR checklist. Data sources: In May 2024, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Scopus were searched. Eligible publications described a palliative care model for adults of culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds in high-income nations and reported evidence of utility. Letters, commentaries, editorials, protocols, reviews, and anonymously-authored publications were excluded. No limits on date, design, numbers, outcomes, or language were applied. Results: Five publications met the inclusion criteria. Four shared components were identified – culturally sensitive care, family and community engagement, interdisciplinary and community-based approaches, as well as education and empowerment – with reported benefits for patients and family members. However, the evidence-base was geographically narrow, with no explicit engagement with an intersectional analytic lens. Conclusions: This review indicates areas of apparent consensus about core components, while underscoring conceptual and evidentiary limitations. Future research should employ theoretically-informed, structurally-oriented, and co-produced approaches that clarify definitions and examine how models address intersecting disadvantages and organisational constraints to achieve equitable, scalable palliative care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Palliative Medicine
Published
2026-05-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/02692163261446184
Primary Topic
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Models of palliative care for culturally and linguistically diverse people in high-income nations: A scoping review

Georgia Rowley, Ann Dadich, Caroline Laurence, Jaklin Eliott et al.
Palliative Medicine
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
article

Models of palliative care for culturally and linguistically diverse people in high-income nations: A scoping review

Georgia Rowley, Ann Dadich, Caroline Laurence, Jaklin Eliott, Catherine Ooi
article en

Abstract

Background: Access to palliative care remains uneven for people described, often variably and controversially, as culturally and linguistically diverse. Terminology and definitions differ across jurisdictions, shaping how models are designed, implemented, and reported. Evidence on model design and impact for people of culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds is limited and heterogeneous. Aim: To map what is known about palliative care models for adults of culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds in high-income nations, describing model components, reported outcomes, implementation influences, and gaps. Design: A scoping review was conducted, guided by the JBI manual and the PRISMA-ScR checklist. Data sources: In May 2024, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Scopus were searched. Eligible publications described a palliative care model for adults of culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds in high-income nations and reported evidence of utility. Letters, commentaries, editorials, protocols, reviews, and anonymously-authored publications were excluded. No limits on date, design, numbers, outcomes, or language were applied. Results: Five publications met the inclusion criteria. Four shared components were identified – culturally sensitive care, family and community engagement, interdisciplinary and community-based approaches, as well as education and empowerment – with reported benefits for patients and family members. However, the evidence-base was geographically narrow, with no explicit engagement with an intersectional analytic lens. Conclusions: This review indicates areas of apparent consensus about core components, while underscoring conceptual and evidentiary limitations. Future research should employ theoretically-informed, structurally-oriented, and co-produced approaches that clarify definitions and examine how models address intersecting disadvantages and organisational constraints to achieve equitable, scalable palliative care.

Palliative Medicine
The University of Adelaide (AU), Western Sydney University (AU)
University of Adelaide
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.