Health Care Access and Glycemic Control Among U.S. Adults With Diabetes: Analysis of National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2011–2018

Background Diabetes remains a major public health concern in the United States, with suboptimal glycemic control contributing to increased risk of complications. Access to health care is often considered important for diabetes management, yet its relationship with glycemic outcomes remains inconsistent. Objective This study examined the association between health care access and glycemic control among U.S. adults with diabetes using nationally representative data. Methods A cross-sectional analysis was conducted using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) from 2011 to 2018. The study included adults aged 18 years or older with diabetes. Poor glycemic control was defined as glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) ≥ 7%. Health care access measures included insurance status, usual source of care, and health care visits. Survey-weighted logistic regression was used to estimate adjusted associations while accounting for the complex sampling design. Results Health care access variables were not significantly associated with poor glycemic control after adjustment. Male sex and Hispanic ethnicity were associated with higher odds of poor glycemic control. Other demographic and clinical variables showed no significant associations. Conclusion This study highlights that health care access alone may not explain differences in glycemic control. Broader factors related to patient characteristics and social conditions should be considered in efforts to improve diabetes outcomes.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2026-05-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.108950
Primary Topic
Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Health Care Access and Glycemic Control Among U.S. Adults With Diabetes: Analysis of National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2011–2018

Okelue E Okobi, Princess Okoronkwo, Emeka Okwuokei, Akinyele Oladimeji et al.
Cureus
Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
article

Health Care Access and Glycemic Control Among U.S. Adults With Diabetes: Analysis of National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2011–2018

Okelue E Okobi, Princess Okoronkwo, Emeka Okwuokei, Akinyele Oladimeji, Nneka Muoghalu, Emmanuel C Nwaokobia, Theresa M Mambu
article en

Abstract

Background Diabetes remains a major public health concern in the United States, with suboptimal glycemic control contributing to increased risk of complications. Access to health care is often considered important for diabetes management, yet its relationship with glycemic outcomes remains inconsistent. Objective This study examined the association between health care access and glycemic control among U.S. adults with diabetes using nationally representative data. Methods A cross-sectional analysis was conducted using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) from 2011 to 2018. The study included adults aged 18 years or older with diabetes. Poor glycemic control was defined as glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) ≥ 7%. Health care access measures included insurance status, usual source of care, and health care visits. Survey-weighted logistic regression was used to estimate adjusted associations while accounting for the complex sampling design. Results Health care access variables were not significantly associated with poor glycemic control after adjustment. Male sex and Hispanic ethnicity were associated with higher odds of poor glycemic control. Other demographic and clinical variables showed no significant associations. Conclusion This study highlights that health care access alone may not explain differences in glycemic control. Broader factors related to patient characteristics and social conditions should be considered in efforts to improve diabetes outcomes.

Cureus
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.