Payor and patient costs for rapid brain MRI: analysis from a single pediatric institution

Abstract Background “Rapid” “Fast” or “Abbreviated” MRI examinations, which leverage fewer sequences to answer a targeted clinical question, are increasingly being explored as clinical tools. Objective The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare payor costs and patient out-of-pocket costs for brain MRI without contrast compared to a rapid brain MRI among commercially insured patients at a quaternary academic children’s hospital. Materials and methods We performed a retrospective search to identify patients with private insurance who underwent an outpatient brain MRI without contrast (standard MRI) or rapid brain MRI at our quaternary academic children’s hospital. Examinations lacking complete payment information were excluded, and only the first exam per patient was included. All rapid MRIs were included; an equal number of standard MRIs were randomly sampled by month. For rapid MRI examinations, we calculated the frequency of cases in which the payor did not recognize the limited modifier, as indicated by the payor reason codes. For all examinations, we calculated the (1) payor cost (the amount reimbursed for the exam) and (2) the patient’s total out-of-pocket cost, calculated as the sum of the deductible, coinsurance, and co-payment. Descriptive statistics were used and means were compared between groups using Student’s t test. Results Our sample included 147 standard MRIs and 166 rapid MRIs (coded with the 52 modifier). Most examinations included patient cost sharing: 77% (113/147) of standard MRIs and 69% of rapid MRIs (115/166). Payor reimbursement differed ( P <0.001) by examination, with higher payor costs for standard MRI (mean, $2,760; SD, $1,187 vs. mean, $1,986; SD, $198) for rapid MRI. Among examinations with cost sharing, the mean total out-of-pocket costs were similar between examination types (standard, $1,206 vs rapid, $1,285; P =0.55). In 43% (71/166) of rapid MRI examinations, the payor did not recognize the limited modifier. Conclusion Although rapid brain MRIs reduced payor reimbursement, patient out-of-pocket costs remained unchanged. Inconsistent recognition of the limited modifier underscores the need for updated CPT codes and reimbursement policies aligned with evolving imaging practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pediatric Radiology
Published
2026-05-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-026-06648-5
Primary Topic
Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Payor and patient costs for rapid brain MRI: analysis from a single pediatric institution

Pradipta Debnath, Lisa Ulland, Mishka Hoo Kim, Andrew Trout et al.
Pediatric Radiology
Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
article

Payor and patient costs for rapid brain MRI: analysis from a single pediatric institution

Pradipta Debnath, Lisa Ulland, Mishka Hoo Kim, Andrew Trout, Shireen Hayatghaibi, Rama Ayyala, Brian Coley
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background “Rapid” “Fast” or “Abbreviated” MRI examinations, which leverage fewer sequences to answer a targeted clinical question, are increasingly being explored as clinical tools. Objective The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare payor costs and patient out-of-pocket costs for brain MRI without contrast compared to a rapid brain MRI among commercially insured patients at a quaternary academic children’s hospital. Materials and methods We performed a retrospective search to identify patients with private insurance who underwent an outpatient brain MRI without contrast (standard MRI) or rapid brain MRI at our quaternary academic children’s hospital. Examinations lacking complete payment information were excluded, and only the first exam per patient was included. All rapid MRIs were included; an equal number of standard MRIs were randomly sampled by month. For rapid MRI examinations, we calculated the frequency of cases in which the payor did not recognize the limited modifier, as indicated by the payor reason codes. For all examinations, we calculated the (1) payor cost (the amount reimbursed for the exam) and (2) the patient’s total out-of-pocket cost, calculated as the sum of the deductible, coinsurance, and co-payment. Descriptive statistics were used and means were compared between groups using Student’s t test. Results Our sample included 147 standard MRIs and 166 rapid MRIs (coded with the 52 modifier). Most examinations included patient cost sharing: 77% (113/147) of standard MRIs and 69% of rapid MRIs (115/166). Payor reimbursement differed ( P <0.001) by examination, with higher payor costs for standard MRI (mean, $2,760; SD, $1,187 vs. mean, $1,986; SD, $198) for rapid MRI. Among examinations with cost sharing, the mean total out-of-pocket costs were similar between examination types (standard, $1,206 vs rapid, $1,285; P =0.55). In 43% (71/166) of rapid MRI examinations, the payor did not recognize the limited modifier. Conclusion Although rapid brain MRIs reduced payor reimbursement, patient out-of-pocket costs remained unchanged. Inconsistent recognition of the limited modifier underscores the need for updated CPT codes and reimbursement policies aligned with evolving imaging practices.

Pediatric Radiology
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (US), Emory University (US), University of Cincinnati (US), University of Cincinnati Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.