National content and local political consequences: Evidence from public and private television

We examine the impact of public versus private television content on political engagement and accountability during the initial rollout of Canada’s television network in the early 1950s. A policy prohibiting market competition restricted districts to receiving either public or private programming, but never both. While both station types aired the public broadcaster’s national service, private stations bundled this content with local news. We find that exposure to the public broadcaster reduced voter turnout by 2.1 percentage points relative to districts without television, while engagement in private television districts remained indistinguishable from pre-television levels. This lack of engagement weakened re-election incentives and increased the incumbency advantage. Consequently, incumbents in public districts spoke less about their constituencies in parliament and demonstrated greater party loyalty in roll-call votes—results consistent with a significant reduction in political accountability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Public Economics
Published
2026-05-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2026.105668
Primary Topic
Media Influence and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

National content and local political consequences: Evidence from public and private television

Andrew Dickens, Mathias Bühler
Journal of Public Economics
Media Influence and Politics
article

National content and local political consequences: Evidence from public and private television

Andrew Dickens, Mathias Bühler
article en

Abstract

We examine the impact of public versus private television content on political engagement and accountability during the initial rollout of Canada’s television network in the early 1950s. A policy prohibiting market competition restricted districts to receiving either public or private programming, but never both. While both station types aired the public broadcaster’s national service, private stations bundled this content with local news. We find that exposure to the public broadcaster reduced voter turnout by 2.1 percentage points relative to districts without television, while engagement in private television districts remained indistinguishable from pre-television levels. This lack of engagement weakened re-election incentives and increased the incumbency advantage. Consequently, incumbents in public districts spoke less about their constituencies in parliament and demonstrated greater party loyalty in roll-call votes—results consistent with a significant reduction in political accountability.

Journal of Public EconomicsVol. 259
Brock University (CA), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Media Influence and Politics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.