Outcomes of Two-Stage Total Hip Replacement for Infected Hemiarthroplasty

Infection following hemiarthroplasty of the hip is a devastating complication associated with significant morbidity. While two-stage revision total hip replacement (THR) is the gold standard for chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in total hip arthroplasty, literature focusing on infected hemiarthroplasty remains limited. This study evaluates the clinical, functional, and radiological outcomes of two-stage revision THR in patients with infected hemiarthroplasty. This retrospective level IV study, conducted in a single center, included 23 patients with confirmed PJI following hemiarthroplasty who underwent two-stage revision THR between January 2015 and January 2024 with a minimum follow-up of two years. Infection was diagnosed using the updated 2018 Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria. The first stage involved implant removal, debridement, and placement of an antibiotic-loaded cement spacer, followed by targeted antibiotic therapy. Reimplantation was performed after five to seven weeks. Functional outcomes were assessed using the Harris hip score (HHS), and radiological evaluation assessed implant stability. Statistical analysis was performed using a paired t-test. The cohort included 14 females and 9 males, with a mean age of 65.96 years. The mean HHS improved significantly from 26.65 preoperatively to 80.52 postoperatively (p < 0.0001). Infection was eradicated in 95.7% of patients, with one case (4.3%) of recurrent infection. Additionally, 52% of the patients were walking without support, 35% of the patients were using one stick for taking long walks, and 13% of patients always required stick support in the last follow-up. No dislocations, aseptic loosening, or implant migration were observed. There was one intraoperative periprosthetic fracture, which was successfully managed. Two-stage revision THR was associated with high infection-control rates and functional improvement in this series of infected hemiarthroplasty patients and remains a reliable treatment strategy.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2026-05-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.108968
Primary Topic
Orthopedic Infections and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Outcomes of Two-Stage Total Hip Replacement for Infected Hemiarthroplasty

Amit Kapoor, N N Kabir
Cureus
Orthopedic Infections and Treatments
article

Outcomes of Two-Stage Total Hip Replacement for Infected Hemiarthroplasty

Amit Kapoor, N N Kabir
article en

Abstract

Infection following hemiarthroplasty of the hip is a devastating complication associated with significant morbidity. While two-stage revision total hip replacement (THR) is the gold standard for chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in total hip arthroplasty, literature focusing on infected hemiarthroplasty remains limited. This study evaluates the clinical, functional, and radiological outcomes of two-stage revision THR in patients with infected hemiarthroplasty. This retrospective level IV study, conducted in a single center, included 23 patients with confirmed PJI following hemiarthroplasty who underwent two-stage revision THR between January 2015 and January 2024 with a minimum follow-up of two years. Infection was diagnosed using the updated 2018 Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria. The first stage involved implant removal, debridement, and placement of an antibiotic-loaded cement spacer, followed by targeted antibiotic therapy. Reimplantation was performed after five to seven weeks. Functional outcomes were assessed using the Harris hip score (HHS), and radiological evaluation assessed implant stability. Statistical analysis was performed using a paired t-test. The cohort included 14 females and 9 males, with a mean age of 65.96 years. The mean HHS improved significantly from 26.65 preoperatively to 80.52 postoperatively (p < 0.0001). Infection was eradicated in 95.7% of patients, with one case (4.3%) of recurrent infection. Additionally, 52% of the patients were walking without support, 35% of the patients were using one stick for taking long walks, and 13% of patients always required stick support in the last follow-up. No dislocations, aseptic loosening, or implant migration were observed. There was one intraoperative periprosthetic fracture, which was successfully managed. Two-stage revision THR was associated with high infection-control rates and functional improvement in this series of infected hemiarthroplasty patients and remains a reliable treatment strategy.

Cureus
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Orthopedic Infections and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.