Utility of intraoperative neuromonitoring changes in predicting postoperative neurologic deficit in lateral lumbar interbody fusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) carries a characteristic risk of lumbar plexus injury. Intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) is widely used to mitigate this risk, yet its aggregate diagnostic accuracy has not been formally quantified. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched through January 24, 2026. Eligible studies were prospective or retrospective observational cohorts of adults undergoing elective LLIF or XLIF with IONM correlated to postoperative neurologic outcomes and isolable 2 × 2 contingency data. Risk of bias was assessed using QUADAS-2. Analyses employed fixed-effect logistic regression, random-effects generalised linear mixed models, bivariate random-effects logistic regression, and Deeks' funnel plot asymmetry test. RESULTS: Seven studies (n = 1,994) were identified; five (n = 1,082) contributed to the primary analysis. Fixed-effect pooled sensitivity was 79.0% (95% CI: 73.0-83.9%) and specificity 95.9% (95% CI: 94.3-97.0%). The bivariate model estimated sensitivity 99.3% (95% CI: 13.7-100%) and specificity 98.8% (95% CI: 80.2-99.9%), with near-zero sensitivity-false positive rate correlation (ρ = +0.05), indicating no threshold effect. Between-study heterogeneity was high (I2 = 78.8%). Individual study sensitivity ranged from 28% to 100%, driven primarily by monitoring modality. Deeks' test was significant (t = +2.75; p = 0.035, one-tailed) but substantially underpowered at k = 5. CONCLUSIONS: IONM in LLIF demonstrates consistently high specificity but highly variable sensitivity, determined principally by monitoring modality. Multimodal protocols incorporating transcranial motor evoked potentials appear superior to unimodal electromyography. Prospective multicentre trials with standardised protocols and deficit-stratified outcomes are needed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Neuroscience
Published
2026-05-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2026.112039
Primary Topic
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Utility of intraoperative neuromonitoring changes in predicting postoperative neurologic deficit in lateral lumbar interbody fusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Prasuna Velur, Vibha Velur, Marvin Gong
Journal of Clinical Neuroscience
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
article

Utility of intraoperative neuromonitoring changes in predicting postoperative neurologic deficit in lateral lumbar interbody fusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Prasuna Velur, Vibha Velur, Marvin Gong
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) carries a characteristic risk of lumbar plexus injury. Intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) is widely used to mitigate this risk, yet its aggregate diagnostic accuracy has not been formally quantified. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched through January 24, 2026. Eligible studies were prospective or retrospective observational cohorts of adults undergoing elective LLIF or XLIF with IONM correlated to postoperative neurologic outcomes and isolable 2 × 2 contingency data. Risk of bias was assessed using QUADAS-2. Analyses employed fixed-effect logistic regression, random-effects generalised linear mixed models, bivariate random-effects logistic regression, and Deeks' funnel plot asymmetry test. RESULTS: Seven studies (n = 1,994) were identified; five (n = 1,082) contributed to the primary analysis. Fixed-effect pooled sensitivity was 79.0% (95% CI: 73.0-83.9%) and specificity 95.9% (95% CI: 94.3-97.0%). The bivariate model estimated sensitivity 99.3% (95% CI: 13.7-100%) and specificity 98.8% (95% CI: 80.2-99.9%), with near-zero sensitivity-false positive rate correlation (ρ = +0.05), indicating no threshold effect. Between-study heterogeneity was high (I2 = 78.8%). Individual study sensitivity ranged from 28% to 100%, driven primarily by monitoring modality. Deeks' test was significant (t = +2.75; p = 0.035, one-tailed) but substantially underpowered at k = 5. CONCLUSIONS: IONM in LLIF demonstrates consistently high specificity but highly variable sensitivity, determined principally by monitoring modality. Multimodal protocols incorporating transcranial motor evoked potentials appear superior to unimodal electromyography. Prospective multicentre trials with standardised protocols and deficit-stratified outcomes are needed.

Journal of Clinical NeuroscienceVol. 151
Keck Hospital of USC (US), Texas A&M University (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.