Next generation open access visualization of neuroanatomy through <scp>3D</scp> modeling and <scp>3D</scp> printing

Three-dimensional (3D) printing technology has transformed anatomy education by enabling students to visualize complex spatial relationships through interactive tactile learning. This technology is particularly valuable for neuroanatomy education, widely regarded as one of the most spatially challenging subjects in health professions curricula where form-function relationships are far less intuitive than other systems. Traditionally, neuroanatomy education has relied on intact donor brains for dissection and commercial neuroanatomical models. However, many institutions lack access to body donor programs that provide whole human brains, and vendor-supplied plastic models can be prohibitively expensive for some institutions. 3D printing addresses both challenges by enabling educators to create accurate, customized neuroanatomical models at a fraction of commercial costs. Despite this significant potential, implementation of 3D-printed models in neuroanatomy curricula remains limited. Anatomy educators face substantial barriers when adopting 3D printing technologies, including sourcing ethically appropriate digital data, selecting suitable printing equipment, choosing the best printing medium (e.g., plastic vs. resin), and effectively integrating these learning aids into existing curricula. To address these challenges, this discursive article provides comprehensive guidance on 3D printing for neuroanatomy education. We examine the pedagogical motivations and methodologies for creating 3D-printed brain models, and we evaluate 3D printing options across multiple domains: cost-effectiveness, required technical expertise, material properties, software accessibility, and model complexity. Through this analysis, we aim to enhance accessibility and knowledge of 3D printing technologies, ultimately supporting broader adoption of this powerful educational tool among anatomy educators.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Anatomical Sciences Education
Published
2026-05-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.70258
Primary Topic
Anatomy and Medical Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Next generation open access visualization of neuroanatomy through 3D modeling and 3D printing

Paul G. McMenamin, Jennifer M. Stratford, Jamie E. Cronin, Steven R. Summers et al.
Anatomical Sciences Education
Anatomy and Medical Technology
article

Next generation open access visualization of neuroanatomy through 3D modeling and 3D printing

Paul G. McMenamin, Jennifer M. Stratford, Jamie E. Cronin, Steven R. Summers, Andrew Cale, Maureen E. Stabio, James P. Lister, Zach D. Stetter
article en

Abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) printing technology has transformed anatomy education by enabling students to visualize complex spatial relationships through interactive tactile learning. This technology is particularly valuable for neuroanatomy education, widely regarded as one of the most spatially challenging subjects in health professions curricula where form-function relationships are far less intuitive than other systems. Traditionally, neuroanatomy education has relied on intact donor brains for dissection and commercial neuroanatomical models. However, many institutions lack access to body donor programs that provide whole human brains, and vendor-supplied plastic models can be prohibitively expensive for some institutions. 3D printing addresses both challenges by enabling educators to create accurate, customized neuroanatomical models at a fraction of commercial costs. Despite this significant potential, implementation of 3D-printed models in neuroanatomy curricula remains limited. Anatomy educators face substantial barriers when adopting 3D printing technologies, including sourcing ethically appropriate digital data, selecting suitable printing equipment, choosing the best printing medium (e.g., plastic vs. resin), and effectively integrating these learning aids into existing curricula. To address these challenges, this discursive article provides comprehensive guidance on 3D printing for neuroanatomy education. We examine the pedagogical motivations and methodologies for creating 3D-printed brain models, and we evaluate 3D printing options across multiple domains: cost-effectiveness, required technical expertise, material properties, software accessibility, and model complexity. Through this analysis, we aim to enhance accessibility and knowledge of 3D printing technologies, ultimately supporting broader adoption of this powerful educational tool among anatomy educators.

Anatomical Sciences Education
University of California, Los Angeles (US), University of Colorado Boulder (US), La Trobe University (AU), Indiana University School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus (US), Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US), Monash University (AU)
Colorado Department of Higher Education
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Anatomy and Medical Technology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.