Explainable multi-agent learning for adaptive terrorist network disruption

Disrupting terrorist networks remains a critical challenge for counter-crime units due to their adaptive, decentralized, and covert nature. Existing approaches provide valuable structural insights but often rely on static representations and do not capture the sequential and adversarial dynamics underlying real-world intervention processes. In this work, we propose an explainable, game-theoretic multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) framework for simulating and analyzing adaptive terrorist network disruption. We formulate the problem as a partially observable, sequential decision-making process between two agents: an attacker, representing a terrorist organization seeking to expand its operational or ideological influence, and a defender, modeling law enforcement entities tasked with disrupting influence and neutralizing key actors. The framework incorporates domain-informed reward functions that capture structural, behavioral, and resilience-related properties of networks, enabling both agents to learn policies through repeated interaction. A central contribution of this work is the integration of explainability into the learning framework, allowing the generation and quantitative evaluation of interpretable rationales for node-level intervention decisions. Rather than modeling the full complexity of radicalization processes, the proposed approach provides a stylized but tractable simulation environment for studying strategic interaction under uncertainty. Empirical evaluations on multiple real-world-inspired extremist network structures show that (i) disruption effectiveness improves with increasing intervention budget but exhibits non-monotonic and network-dependent behavior, (ii) outcomes are strongly shaped by attacker-defender strategy interactions rather than individual strategies alone, and (iii) learned policies produce consistent and structured explanation patterns that reveal underlying network vulnerabilities. These findings demonstrate that explainable MARL can provide actionable insights into adaptive intervention strategies and serve as a decision-support tool for intelligence-led policing in complex networked environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-05-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-52996-5
Primary Topic
Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Explainable multi-agent learning for adaptive terrorist network disruption

Vedat Dogan, Barry O’Sullivan, Steven Prestwich
Scientific Reports
Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
article

Explainable multi-agent learning for adaptive terrorist network disruption

Vedat Dogan, Barry O’Sullivan, Steven Prestwich
article en

Abstract

Disrupting terrorist networks remains a critical challenge for counter-crime units due to their adaptive, decentralized, and covert nature. Existing approaches provide valuable structural insights but often rely on static representations and do not capture the sequential and adversarial dynamics underlying real-world intervention processes. In this work, we propose an explainable, game-theoretic multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) framework for simulating and analyzing adaptive terrorist network disruption. We formulate the problem as a partially observable, sequential decision-making process between two agents: an attacker, representing a terrorist organization seeking to expand its operational or ideological influence, and a defender, modeling law enforcement entities tasked with disrupting influence and neutralizing key actors. The framework incorporates domain-informed reward functions that capture structural, behavioral, and resilience-related properties of networks, enabling both agents to learn policies through repeated interaction. A central contribution of this work is the integration of explainability into the learning framework, allowing the generation and quantitative evaluation of interpretable rationales for node-level intervention decisions. Rather than modeling the full complexity of radicalization processes, the proposed approach provides a stylized but tractable simulation environment for studying strategic interaction under uncertainty. Empirical evaluations on multiple real-world-inspired extremist network structures show that (i) disruption effectiveness improves with increasing intervention budget but exhibits non-monotonic and network-dependent behavior, (ii) outcomes are strongly shaped by attacker-defender strategy interactions rather than individual strategies alone, and (iii) learned policies produce consistent and structured explanation patterns that reveal underlying network vulnerabilities. These findings demonstrate that explainable MARL can provide actionable insights into adaptive intervention strategies and serve as a decision-support tool for intelligence-led policing in complex networked environments.

Scientific Reports
University College Cork (IE)
European Regional Development Fund, Research Ireland
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.