Discussion of “Evaluation of Data-Driven and Empirical Models for the Estimation of Sediment Removal Efficiency in Settling Basins”

The discussers express their gratitude to the authors utilizing data-driven models including adaptive boost regressor (ADBR), extreme gradient boost regressor (XGBR), random forest (RF), and random tree (RT) to predict the sediment removal efficiency and compare their results with empirical models such as United States Bureau of Reclamation (USBR), Garde, Raju, Camp-Dobbins, and Sumer models.Through a systematic examination of publicly available data sources, a database of 328 experimental observations was compiled.Among the empirical models, the Salmasi model exhibited a higher degree of accuracy, followed by the USBR, Garde, Raju, Camp-Dobbins, and Sumer models.The data-driven models were ranked from best to worst as ADBR, XGBR, RF, and RT, respectively.Additionally, the most suitable range of input parameters was assessed using the best-performing data-driven model, ADBR.The discussers highlight relevant factors that warrant attention to enhance the original study's findings and further advance the field.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Published
2026-05-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1061/jidedh.ireng-10679
Primary Topic
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Discussion of “Evaluation of Data-Driven and Empirical Models for the Estimation of Sediment Removal Efficiency in Settling Basins”

Sahar Mohsenzadeh Karimi, Parveen Sihag, Divya Singh
Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
article

Discussion of “Evaluation of Data-Driven and Empirical Models for the Estimation of Sediment Removal Efficiency in Settling Basins”

Sahar Mohsenzadeh Karimi, Parveen Sihag, Divya Singh
article en

Abstract

The discussers express their gratitude to the authors utilizing data-driven models including adaptive boost regressor (ADBR), extreme gradient boost regressor (XGBR), random forest (RF), and random tree (RT) to predict the sediment removal efficiency and compare their results with empirical models such as United States Bureau of Reclamation (USBR), Garde, Raju, Camp-Dobbins, and Sumer models.Through a systematic examination of publicly available data sources, a database of 328 experimental observations was compiled.Among the empirical models, the Salmasi model exhibited a higher degree of accuracy, followed by the USBR, Garde, Raju, Camp-Dobbins, and Sumer models.The data-driven models were ranked from best to worst as ADBR, XGBR, RF, and RT, respectively.Additionally, the most suitable range of input parameters was assessed using the best-performing data-driven model, ADBR.The discussers highlight relevant factors that warrant attention to enhance the original study's findings and further advance the field.

Journal of Irrigation and Drainage EngineeringVol. 152(4)
Chandigarh University (IN), University of Arizona (US), Uttaranchal University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.