In their own words: a qualitative exploration of patients’ perspectives of genetic counseling sessions across clinical disciplines

Genetic counselors (GCs) help individuals navigate living with genetic conditions via models of practice that emphasize GC-defined processes and outcomes. While quantitative, patient-reported measures have assessed patients' experiences and outcomes, there are limited qualitative studies that explore patient-reported impressions of genetic counseling in their own voice. A subset of genetic counseling patients enrolled in the Genetic Counseling Processes Result in Outcomes (GC-PRO) study completed a semi-structured phone or video interview within 1-2 weeks of their genetic counseling session. Transcripts (n = 25) were purposefully sampled from different clinic locations (three institutions), specialties (prenatal, cancer, cardiology, general genetics), participant responses to quantitative surveys, and demographics. A constructivist approach via reflexive thematic analysis identified five themes about the patient experience with GC behaviors and outcomes: (1) Follow my lead; (2) Working collaboratively over time; (3) We value information; (4) GC expertise and caring demeanor are unique; and (5) I left with takeaways. Patients identified the importance of GC behaviors that fostered a patient-led, collaborative session where informational and supportive needs were met in a tailored manner. Clear information-giving from a knowledgeable GC was consistently perceived to be valuable. Participants typically did not enter a session with a predetermined outcome, yet they later identified emotional impacts, gaining new perspectives about genetic information, and feeling empowered by actionable recommendations as outcomes. This research adds to the literature on patient-defined outcomes and perspectives on counseling processes which at times differ from classical provider definitions and serves to support additions to the current models of practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Community Genetics
Published
2026-05-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-026-00897-5
Primary Topic
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

In their own words: a qualitative exploration of patients’ perspectives of genetic counseling sessions across clinical disciplines

T. J. Maresca, Krista Redlinger‐Grosse, Elena R. Fisher, Lindsay Peifer et al.
Journal of Community Genetics
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
article

In their own words: a qualitative exploration of patients’ perspectives of genetic counseling sessions across clinical disciplines

T. J. Maresca, Krista Redlinger‐Grosse, Elena R. Fisher, Lindsay Peifer, Heather Zierhut, Deborah Cragun, Rebekah Pratt
article en

Abstract

Genetic counselors (GCs) help individuals navigate living with genetic conditions via models of practice that emphasize GC-defined processes and outcomes. While quantitative, patient-reported measures have assessed patients' experiences and outcomes, there are limited qualitative studies that explore patient-reported impressions of genetic counseling in their own voice. A subset of genetic counseling patients enrolled in the Genetic Counseling Processes Result in Outcomes (GC-PRO) study completed a semi-structured phone or video interview within 1-2 weeks of their genetic counseling session. Transcripts (n = 25) were purposefully sampled from different clinic locations (three institutions), specialties (prenatal, cancer, cardiology, general genetics), participant responses to quantitative surveys, and demographics. A constructivist approach via reflexive thematic analysis identified five themes about the patient experience with GC behaviors and outcomes: (1) Follow my lead; (2) Working collaboratively over time; (3) We value information; (4) GC expertise and caring demeanor are unique; and (5) I left with takeaways. Patients identified the importance of GC behaviors that fostered a patient-led, collaborative session where informational and supportive needs were met in a tailored manner. Clear information-giving from a knowledgeable GC was consistently perceived to be valuable. Participants typically did not enter a session with a predetermined outcome, yet they later identified emotional impacts, gaining new perspectives about genetic information, and feeling empowered by actionable recommendations as outcomes. This research adds to the literature on patient-defined outcomes and perspectives on counseling processes which at times differ from classical provider definitions and serves to support additions to the current models of practice.

Journal of Community GeneticsVol. 17(3)
University of Minnesota (US), University of South Florida (US), University of Minnesota Medical Center (US)
National Human Genome Research Institute
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.